Accuracy or speed

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Message
Author
Mr_Logic

Re: Accuracy or speed

#11 Post by Mr_Logic »

Hmmm.

I load for 308 on a chargemaster, and I get a pretty low ES. Apart from the first round (clean, cold bore) it was around 8-12 fps IIRC. I did nothing except neck size new Lapua brass, and do charges on the chargemaster.

Loading 223 is a lot more of a ballache, they have to be spot on right and I can't afford a very fine scale. so I throw, weigh on the CM's scale and then weigh again on my RCBS 505. Both scales need to agree before powder goes into case. And even then, it's still not amazing.

I think the answer lies with brass, not with powder charge tbh. 0.2gr does that to my 223, which is why I need to be more accurate, but in 308, all was pretty well. I shot Stickledown last weekend in the rain. Before my rifle was wet the elevation plot was around a half-minute at 900 yards, I used H4895 and also IMR4320 because I'd run out of 4895. At 1000, my elevation was similarly consistent until the water overwhelmed my best efforts, and then pressures spiked and it was less good. However, on a TR V-bull, it was still in there all the time. Wind changed at the very end and threw a few right. but they were still OK for elevation.

So I think that you're barking up the wrong tree with the elevation issues.
EagerNoSkill

Re: Accuracy or speed

#12 Post by EagerNoSkill »

Hi all

I understand the views that I maybe barking up trees etc feel that but the following information / facts are known to me

1. BALLISTIC
Ballistic program shows 50 fps makes 1.25 moa difference at 1000
The actual chrono'ing and precise measurement of powders of my loads shows 50 fps difference for my powder gun case bullet combo
My equipment has a known variance of 0.2 - and it aligns with some of the discrepancy at 1000 yards

So I will strive to remove that variance - then I know it is me the baboon on the butt that is the problem therefter
I am just trying to remove the variables i can so that i can assess own contribution to cause and affect as clearly as possible

2. V-BULL
With a 5" v-bull at 1000 yards WIND is already the dominant factor - with its own elevation contributions
I need to remove the ammo based elevation changes - then the shooter based - including learning the wind based changes!

So i will bark up this tree - chop it down - burn it and then find something else to blame later!
:cheers:
User avatar
meles meles
Posts: 6335
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
Home club or Range: HBSA
Location: Underground
Contact:

Re: Accuracy or speed

#13 Post by meles meles »

We think the following gunslinger's adage sums it up best, ooman:

"Speed is fine, but accuracy is final"
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun



Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests