Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy

Anything Fullbore rifle related, Hunting, Target, Match.

Moderator: dromia

Message
Author
User avatar
Dellboy
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 2635
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:49 am
Home club or Range: Star Shooting Club
Location: Essex
Contact:

Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy

#11 Post by Dellboy »

Just bought a brand new old 1894 IN 44 MAG sat in a safe since purchased new in 1998 so is it worth that much ??
2020 GOOD DEALS WITH

Cutch Vortex Scope
Mauserbill Enfield Books


Enjoy today as tomorrow might not come .

Noli pati a scelestis opprimi.

002515
GeeRam

Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy

#12 Post by GeeRam »

jdwoodbury wrote: I welcome peoples thoughts, especially those who have shot both.
I've shot both, and wouldn't buy either.

If I wanted a '92 action, I'd buy a Rossi, the Rossi's I've used have been better than any of the Marlins I've used.

But, if you have a £1k budget, as a couple of others have said, buy a Uberti 1873 Carbine..........they are beautifully made, and the '73 toggle action is super-slick.
greenshoots

Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy

#13 Post by greenshoots »

73 toggle action is super-slick.

agree smooth but only suitable for blackpowder level loads

greenshoots
jdwoodbury

Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy

#14 Post by jdwoodbury »

That Uberti looks stunning...

I think my big sticking point is that the Marlin allows a scope mount which could be useful should I be serious about gallery rifle competitions. My local RFD now has these in so I will going to take a look today. I believe the Henry is also now drilled and tapped for a scope mount, with only the loading mechanism being contentious.

Decisions, decisions....
Last edited by jdwoodbury on Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
GeeRam

Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy

#15 Post by GeeRam »

greenshoots wrote:73 toggle action is super-slick.

agree smooth but only suitable for blackpowder level loads
Can't really think why you'd need more unless you are going to hunt with it......which the OP didn't seem to indicate he would?
GeeRam

Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy

#16 Post by GeeRam »

jdwoodbury wrote:That Uberti looks stunning...

I think my big sticking point is that the Marlin allows a scope mount which could be useful should I be serious about gallery rifle competitions. My local RFD now has these in so I will going to take a look today.
I'm too old fashioned for that, scopes just look soooooo wrong on a lever action to my purist eyes, but yes, the '73 doesn't allow for that.

You can get scope mounts for the Rossi though, and my point still stands, I'd still buy a Rossi rather than a Marlin (maybe its just all 3 x different Marlins I've shot have been lemons, but the 2 x different Rossi's I've shot were much nicer than any of the Marlins, and half the price!)
User avatar
Les
Posts: 4561
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 12:19 pm
Home club or Range: WRPC
Location: Runcorn, via Africa and parts unknown.
Contact:

Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy

#17 Post by Les »

Henry for me any day. Their actions are silky smooth, they are accurate - and they really look the part, too!
User avatar
WelshShooter
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 1811
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 9:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy

#18 Post by WelshShooter »

jdwoodbury wrote:That Uberti looks stunning...

I think my big sticking point is that the Marlin allows a scope mount which could be useful should I be serious about gallery rifle competitions. My local RFD now has these in so I will going to take a look today. I believe the Henry is also now drilled and tapped for a scope mount, with only the loading mechanism being contentious.

Decisions, decisions....
Not sure about the Big Boy but the Marlin is a side eject rifle too, so no need to worry about spent cases bouncing off the scope and jamming the action.
User avatar
Sim G
Posts: 10752
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy

#19 Post by Sim G »

I'm afraid I wouldn't buy a new Marlin today. Supposedly SMK have had a delivery of 50 new .44 Marlins. Seems the street price of these in the Gunshop's is a pound under a grand!

I've never owned a Henry, but shot one on several occasions. If not well practised with a gate loading lever gun then the tube system won't cause you too much trouble. They are very made and finished, but utterly over engineered.

Looking for a new lever gun today and had a £1k to spend, I'd be looking at Uberti without a doubt. Rossi are not to be sniffed at. We have a 10 year old carbine in the club that still sees 2-300 rounds a week go through it. They're tough.
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
User avatar
Whizzbang
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 1:42 am
Contact:

Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy

#20 Post by Whizzbang »

If gallery rifle competition is something you might consider, I would go for a pre-Remington Marlin. I've had three and still shoot two (.357mag and 45Colt Cowboy). They have proved a joy to use: accurate, slick and handy. One wears a scope, the other peep sights.

As previously mentioned, the "Remlins" were troubled guns, though that may have improved more recently.

Pre-Remington Marlins have "JM" stamped on the side of the barrel, Remington Marlins have serial numbers beginning "MR", I believe. However, there were some produced in the changeover period that have JM stamp and "pre-Remington-style" serial numbers that were made by Remington and had faults. These were around 2008-9 (serial no.s beginning 91xxxxx and 92xxxx).

I expect SimG could tell you more (and correct my errors.)

I hope this doesn't put you off Marlins, they are great guns but Remington has put a huge dent in their well-deserved good reputation.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests