Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy
Moderator: dromia
- Dellboy
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 2635
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:49 am
- Home club or Range: Star Shooting Club
- Location: Essex
- Contact:
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy
Just bought a brand new old 1894 IN 44 MAG sat in a safe since purchased new in 1998 so is it worth that much ??
2020 GOOD DEALS WITH
Cutch Vortex Scope
Mauserbill Enfield Books
Enjoy today as tomorrow might not come .
Noli pati a scelestis opprimi.
002515
Cutch Vortex Scope
Mauserbill Enfield Books
Enjoy today as tomorrow might not come .
Noli pati a scelestis opprimi.
002515
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy
I've shot both, and wouldn't buy either.jdwoodbury wrote: I welcome peoples thoughts, especially those who have shot both.
If I wanted a '92 action, I'd buy a Rossi, the Rossi's I've used have been better than any of the Marlins I've used.
But, if you have a £1k budget, as a couple of others have said, buy a Uberti 1873 Carbine..........they are beautifully made, and the '73 toggle action is super-slick.
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy
73 toggle action is super-slick.
agree smooth but only suitable for blackpowder level loads
greenshoots
agree smooth but only suitable for blackpowder level loads
greenshoots
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy
That Uberti looks stunning...
I think my big sticking point is that the Marlin allows a scope mount which could be useful should I be serious about gallery rifle competitions. My local RFD now has these in so I will going to take a look today. I believe the Henry is also now drilled and tapped for a scope mount, with only the loading mechanism being contentious.
Decisions, decisions....
I think my big sticking point is that the Marlin allows a scope mount which could be useful should I be serious about gallery rifle competitions. My local RFD now has these in so I will going to take a look today. I believe the Henry is also now drilled and tapped for a scope mount, with only the loading mechanism being contentious.
Decisions, decisions....
Last edited by jdwoodbury on Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy
Can't really think why you'd need more unless you are going to hunt with it......which the OP didn't seem to indicate he would?greenshoots wrote:73 toggle action is super-slick.
agree smooth but only suitable for blackpowder level loads
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy
I'm too old fashioned for that, scopes just look soooooo wrong on a lever action to my purist eyes, but yes, the '73 doesn't allow for that.jdwoodbury wrote:That Uberti looks stunning...
I think my big sticking point is that the Marlin allows a scope mount which could be useful should I be serious about gallery rifle competitions. My local RFD now has these in so I will going to take a look today.
You can get scope mounts for the Rossi though, and my point still stands, I'd still buy a Rossi rather than a Marlin (maybe its just all 3 x different Marlins I've shot have been lemons, but the 2 x different Rossi's I've shot were much nicer than any of the Marlins, and half the price!)
- Les
- Posts: 4561
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 12:19 pm
- Home club or Range: WRPC
- Location: Runcorn, via Africa and parts unknown.
- Contact:
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy
Henry for me any day. Their actions are silky smooth, they are accurate - and they really look the part, too!
- WelshShooter
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 1811
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 9:45 pm
- Contact:
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy
Not sure about the Big Boy but the Marlin is a side eject rifle too, so no need to worry about spent cases bouncing off the scope and jamming the action.jdwoodbury wrote:That Uberti looks stunning...
I think my big sticking point is that the Marlin allows a scope mount which could be useful should I be serious about gallery rifle competitions. My local RFD now has these in so I will going to take a look today. I believe the Henry is also now drilled and tapped for a scope mount, with only the loading mechanism being contentious.
Decisions, decisions....
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy
I'm afraid I wouldn't buy a new Marlin today. Supposedly SMK have had a delivery of 50 new .44 Marlins. Seems the street price of these in the Gunshop's is a pound under a grand!
I've never owned a Henry, but shot one on several occasions. If not well practised with a gate loading lever gun then the tube system won't cause you too much trouble. They are very made and finished, but utterly over engineered.
Looking for a new lever gun today and had a £1k to spend, I'd be looking at Uberti without a doubt. Rossi are not to be sniffed at. We have a 10 year old carbine in the club that still sees 2-300 rounds a week go through it. They're tough.
I've never owned a Henry, but shot one on several occasions. If not well practised with a gate loading lever gun then the tube system won't cause you too much trouble. They are very made and finished, but utterly over engineered.
Looking for a new lever gun today and had a £1k to spend, I'd be looking at Uberti without a doubt. Rossi are not to be sniffed at. We have a 10 year old carbine in the club that still sees 2-300 rounds a week go through it. They're tough.
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Re: Marlin 1894 vs Henry Big Boy
If gallery rifle competition is something you might consider, I would go for a pre-Remington Marlin. I've had three and still shoot two (.357mag and 45Colt Cowboy). They have proved a joy to use: accurate, slick and handy. One wears a scope, the other peep sights.
As previously mentioned, the "Remlins" were troubled guns, though that may have improved more recently.
Pre-Remington Marlins have "JM" stamped on the side of the barrel, Remington Marlins have serial numbers beginning "MR", I believe. However, there were some produced in the changeover period that have JM stamp and "pre-Remington-style" serial numbers that were made by Remington and had faults. These were around 2008-9 (serial no.s beginning 91xxxxx and 92xxxx).
I expect SimG could tell you more (and correct my errors.)
I hope this doesn't put you off Marlins, they are great guns but Remington has put a huge dent in their well-deserved good reputation.
As previously mentioned, the "Remlins" were troubled guns, though that may have improved more recently.
Pre-Remington Marlins have "JM" stamped on the side of the barrel, Remington Marlins have serial numbers beginning "MR", I believe. However, there were some produced in the changeover period that have JM stamp and "pre-Remington-style" serial numbers that were made by Remington and had faults. These were around 2008-9 (serial no.s beginning 91xxxxx and 92xxxx).
I expect SimG could tell you more (and correct my errors.)
I hope this doesn't put you off Marlins, they are great guns but Remington has put a huge dent in their well-deserved good reputation.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests