SAS firearms.

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
User avatar
BamBam
Posts: 2695
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: Royston vasey
Contact:

Re: SAS firearms.

#31 Post by BamBam »

DW58 wrote:
BamBam wrote:
DW58 wrote:Surely I'm as entitled to my opinion as the next man - and mine is that this is a totally pointless topic full of speculation and nonsense.
Don't call me Shirley.

That's your opinion, but you're not questioning any specific other opinion, just making a general comment.

Gundoc made good points, as I know Gundoc in real life I know that he has knowledge that civvies wouldn't have. He doesn't speculate and he doesn't type nonsense.
He might not, but as for you ... ...

Image
We can't all be Tier One Operators like you.
Image
Thorney

Re: SAS firearms.

#32 Post by Thorney »

Jeeze, is it time of the month or something?

This is a shooting forum, yes? Where we chat about shooting and guns, yes?

What's the harm of chatting about military firearms then?

Not every thread has to be discussing cures for cancer and or not lead to absolute conclusions?

Talk about suck the life out of a place.
User avatar
BamBam
Posts: 2695
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: Royston vasey
Contact:

Re: SAS firearms.

#33 Post by BamBam »

There's no harm in talking about military firearms, or at least I thought so until the self-appointed fun police start calling people names.

But as we're on the topic of SAS firearms. I was a total fanboy for the MP5. First time I saw one was when the embassy siege was on the news back in 1980.
Years later, 2004, I got to shoot one in Vegas, well worth the wait. bangbang
Image
User avatar
dromia
Site Admin
Posts: 20230
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
Contact:

Re: SAS firearms.

#34 Post by dromia »

That thread is now locked and people have moved on, leave what has been where it is.

If people don't agree with what has been said then fine state your opposing view and debate it as vigorously as you will but don't belittle other peoples view and spoil the thread.

This an internet forum and exists on opinions and they should be respected as well as disagreed with.

Belittling behaviour only reflects badly on the belittler. Pride comes before the fall so tread carefully when stating opinions as absolutes.
Image

Come on Bambi get some

Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad

Fecking stones

Real farmers don't need subsidies

Cow's farts matter!

For fine firearms and requisites visit

http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
User avatar
safetyfirst
Posts: 2651
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:41 am
Contact:

Re: SAS firearms.

#35 Post by safetyfirst »

Sigh.
ordnance
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:00 pm
Location: N. Ireland. UK.
Contact:

Re: SAS firearms.

#36 Post by ordnance »

I was a total fanboy for the MP5
Yes the police used to carry them here, a step up from the sterling bellow.
Blu

Re: SAS firearms.

#37 Post by Blu »

safetyfirst wrote:Sigh.
I agree, how about the mods quit locking threads and instead lock out the grumpy ones with nothing to contribute to a thread. Locking threads is unfair on those who want nothing more than to discuss a topic.
Airbrush
Posts: 1251
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:26 am
Home club or Range: Nra
Location: Devon
Contact:

Re: SAS firearms.

#38 Post by Airbrush »

Blu wrote:
safetyfirst wrote:Sigh.
I agree, how about the mods quit locking threads and instead lock out the grumpy ones with nothing to contribute to a thread. Locking threads is unfair on those who want nothing more than to discuss a topic.
Or you could just ignore them & carry on. ;)
Maggot

Re: SAS firearms.

#39 Post by Maggot »

PINK

green55
Blu

Re: SAS firearms.

#40 Post by Blu »

Airbrush wrote:
Blu wrote:
safetyfirst wrote:Sigh.
I agree, how about the mods quit locking threads and instead lock out the grumpy ones with nothing to contribute to a thread. Locking threads is unfair on those who want nothing more than to discuss a topic.
Or you could just ignore them & carry on. ;)
Yep there's that as well.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests