Alpha1 wrote:you WILL NEVER LEGALLY OWN HAND GUNS IN THE UK. Live with it move on.
Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act
Moderator: dromia
Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act
You have nothing to lose by letting us try.
Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act
Ares590 "crucial difference, you have the second amendment and a generally accepted (even by a lot of people on the anti side) right to keep and bear arms."
Fair comment but you have to understand that change hasn't just happen through the courts and by quoting the 2nd Amendment. It's also happen through the power of the ballot box. Getting rid of the anti politicians with their draconian laws and replacing them with politicians who have repealed those laws. As I stated earlier, I've seen it happen.
Where I live, up until 11 years ago it was illegal for anyone to use a firearm to defend themselves in their home or on the street. Through people power and the ballot box, that changed.
Blu
Fair comment but you have to understand that change hasn't just happen through the courts and by quoting the 2nd Amendment. It's also happen through the power of the ballot box. Getting rid of the anti politicians with their draconian laws and replacing them with politicians who have repealed those laws. As I stated earlier, I've seen it happen.
Where I live, up until 11 years ago it was illegal for anyone to use a firearm to defend themselves in their home or on the street. Through people power and the ballot box, that changed.
Blu

Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act
I think it's helpful to categorise who in the shooting community we would need to win over, in order to support such an effort. Would I be correct in assuming we have the following 3 categories?
1) Those who had their pistols taken from them and were forced to move in to other disciplines. I assume they're still resentful and feel there's little merit in dredging up bad memories, when the prospect of a successful campaign is seen as little to non. i.e. Let sleeping dogs lie.
2) Those that feel it's an unnecessary risk to the public because they're easily concealed.
3) Those that have no interest in supporting anything outside their own discipline.
If that's an exhaustive list, what percentage would you attribute to each?
1) Those who had their pistols taken from them and were forced to move in to other disciplines. I assume they're still resentful and feel there's little merit in dredging up bad memories, when the prospect of a successful campaign is seen as little to non. i.e. Let sleeping dogs lie.
2) Those that feel it's an unnecessary risk to the public because they're easily concealed.
3) Those that have no interest in supporting anything outside their own discipline.
If that's an exhaustive list, what percentage would you attribute to each?
Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act
What is required is a campaign. With TV advertising and the works. And be prepared to be vilified. And have acid on cars and all sorts. Because the mainstream doesn't want this because the press will go bananas and most people are simply sheep.
However.
If the money is there to do this long term, you put it to the top of the agenda. And we do have our bill of rights which could be used in a legal battle.
It is not impossible. It just needs a kind and generous billionaire. Know you of such a beast?
However.
If the money is there to do this long term, you put it to the top of the agenda. And we do have our bill of rights which could be used in a legal battle.
It is not impossible. It just needs a kind and generous billionaire. Know you of such a beast?
- Sandgroper
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 4735
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:45 pm
- Location: Stanley, Falkland Islands
- Contact:
Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act
I don't think it could happen due to advertising laws - http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes ... ories.aspxMr_Logic wrote:What is required is a campaign. With TV advertising and the works. And be prepared to be vilified. And have acid on cars and all sorts. Because the mainstream doesn't want this because the press will go bananas and most people are simply sheep.
However.
If the money is there to do this long term, you put it to the top of the agenda. And we do have our bill of rights which could be used in a legal battle.
It is not impossible. It just needs a kind and generous billionaire. Know you of such a beast?
10.1.4 guns (including replica guns), gun clubs and offensive weapons. “Offensive weapons” are items made or adapted to cause injury. References to clay pigeon shoots are permitted only as part of a wider range of outdoor pursuits
“The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.”
Lieutenant General David Morrison
I plink, therefore I shoot.
Lieutenant General David Morrison
I plink, therefore I shoot.
Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act
Alpha1 wrote:I can tell you that you are wasting your time you WILL NEVER LEGALLY OWN HAND GUNS IN THE UK. Live with it move on.
Well, that's not strictly true.
Northern Ireland has cartridge handguns on S1. Other parts of Great Britain such as the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man also still have cartridge pistols on S1. On the mainland we still have muzzle loaders which are handguns and you can own S7.1 at home without ammo and keep S7.3 at a "Heritage Centre" and shoot them. A friend has 10 pistols on FAC under this section from a couple of Webleys, a Hi-Power and P38 as well as a Colt Python and a couple of Smiths.
Likewise, another friend has a Sig 226 for humane dispatch with a restricted magazine and another friend has a unrestricted .44 magnum because of the type of game, wild boar, he has to dispatch in ancient woodland.
So it's not about "never legally owning a handgun", it's about having new legislation to again include cartridge pistols for sport and target shooting.
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act
Alpha1 wrote:Erika
What is your primary Club if you live Local may be you would like to attend one of our guest days and discuss your views with my fellow club members our oldest member was at Dunkirk and was a career soldier the rest of the Guys have been shooting for a average of 30 years.
And? Even just on this thread there are a number of ex-soldiers and one serving, myself included, who have seen active service and have been shooting for many years. Is our service and experience not as valued or important?
And perhaps that is the point why so many of the "Old Guard" are not interested in seeing pistols extended back to sport on the mainland, as it's unlikely to happen within their life times........
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act
Who the f*** do this lot think they are?!Sandgroper wrote:I don't think it could happen due to advertising laws - http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes ... ories.aspx
10.1.4 guns (including replica guns), gun clubs and offensive weapons. “Offensive weapons” are items made or adapted to cause injury. References to clay pigeon shoots are permitted only as part of a wider range of outdoor pursuits
Right, angry journo email time...
- Graham M
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:14 pm
- Location: Brum
- Contact:
Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act
Just out of interest I read this on the Google home page this very morning.
It's an extract from the Olympic Charter..
I wonder why it never applies to shooting
G.M.
It's an extract from the Olympic Charter..
"The practice of sport is a human right. Every individual must have the possibility of practicing sport, without discrimination of any kind and in the Olympic spirit, which requires mutual understanding with a spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play."
I wonder why it never applies to shooting


G.M.
Never argue with an idiot, he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
-
- Posts: 2004
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 7:05 am
- Home club or Range: Bdrpc ebrpc
- Contact:
Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act
Becase pp1 Mt 1500 etc etc etc are not Olympic recognised sports....which is a bummer...Graham M wrote:Just out of interest I read this on the Google home page this very morning.
It's an extract from the Olympic Charter.."The practice of sport is a human right. Every individual must have the possibility of practicing sport, without discrimination of any kind and in the Olympic spirit, which requires mutual understanding with a spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play."
I wonder why it never applies to shooting![]()
![]()
G.M.
When someone says "it's not about the money" you know what? it probably is all about money!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests