Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
HALODIN

Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act

#161 Post by HALODIN »

You have nothing to lose by letting us try.
Alpha1 wrote:you WILL NEVER LEGALLY OWN HAND GUNS IN THE UK. Live with it move on.
Blu

Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act

#162 Post by Blu »

Ares590 "crucial difference, you have the second amendment and a generally accepted (even by a lot of people on the anti side) right to keep and bear arms."

Fair comment but you have to understand that change hasn't just happen through the courts and by quoting the 2nd Amendment. It's also happen through the power of the ballot box. Getting rid of the anti politicians with their draconian laws and replacing them with politicians who have repealed those laws. As I stated earlier, I've seen it happen.

Where I live, up until 11 years ago it was illegal for anyone to use a firearm to defend themselves in their home or on the street. Through people power and the ballot box, that changed.

Blu :twisted:
HALODIN

Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act

#163 Post by HALODIN »

I think it's helpful to categorise who in the shooting community we would need to win over, in order to support such an effort. Would I be correct in assuming we have the following 3 categories?

1) Those who had their pistols taken from them and were forced to move in to other disciplines. I assume they're still resentful and feel there's little merit in dredging up bad memories, when the prospect of a successful campaign is seen as little to non. i.e. Let sleeping dogs lie.

2) Those that feel it's an unnecessary risk to the public because they're easily concealed.

3) Those that have no interest in supporting anything outside their own discipline.

If that's an exhaustive list, what percentage would you attribute to each?
Mr_Logic

Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act

#164 Post by Mr_Logic »

What is required is a campaign. With TV advertising and the works. And be prepared to be vilified. And have acid on cars and all sorts. Because the mainstream doesn't want this because the press will go bananas and most people are simply sheep.

However.

If the money is there to do this long term, you put it to the top of the agenda. And we do have our bill of rights which could be used in a legal battle.

It is not impossible. It just needs a kind and generous billionaire. Know you of such a beast?
User avatar
Sandgroper
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 4735
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: Stanley, Falkland Islands
Contact:

Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act

#165 Post by Sandgroper »

Mr_Logic wrote:What is required is a campaign. With TV advertising and the works. And be prepared to be vilified. And have acid on cars and all sorts. Because the mainstream doesn't want this because the press will go bananas and most people are simply sheep.

However.

If the money is there to do this long term, you put it to the top of the agenda. And we do have our bill of rights which could be used in a legal battle.

It is not impossible. It just needs a kind and generous billionaire. Know you of such a beast?
I don't think it could happen due to advertising laws - http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes ... ories.aspx
10.1.4 guns (including replica guns), gun clubs and offensive weapons. “Offensive weapons” are items made or adapted to cause injury. References to clay pigeon shoots are permitted only as part of a wider range of outdoor pursuits
“The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.”

Lieutenant General David Morrison

I plink, therefore I shoot.
User avatar
Sim G
Posts: 10752
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act

#166 Post by Sim G »

Alpha1 wrote:I can tell you that you are wasting your time you WILL NEVER LEGALLY OWN HAND GUNS IN THE UK. Live with it move on.

Well, that's not strictly true.

Northern Ireland has cartridge handguns on S1. Other parts of Great Britain such as the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man also still have cartridge pistols on S1. On the mainland we still have muzzle loaders which are handguns and you can own S7.1 at home without ammo and keep S7.3 at a "Heritage Centre" and shoot them. A friend has 10 pistols on FAC under this section from a couple of Webleys, a Hi-Power and P38 as well as a Colt Python and a couple of Smiths.

Likewise, another friend has a Sig 226 for humane dispatch with a restricted magazine and another friend has a unrestricted .44 magnum because of the type of game, wild boar, he has to dispatch in ancient woodland.

So it's not about "never legally owning a handgun", it's about having new legislation to again include cartridge pistols for sport and target shooting.
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
User avatar
Sim G
Posts: 10752
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act

#167 Post by Sim G »

Alpha1 wrote:Erika
What is your primary Club if you live Local may be you would like to attend one of our guest days and discuss your views with my fellow club members our oldest member was at Dunkirk and was a career soldier the rest of the Guys have been shooting for a average of 30 years.

And? Even just on this thread there are a number of ex-soldiers and one serving, myself included, who have seen active service and have been shooting for many years. Is our service and experience not as valued or important?

And perhaps that is the point why so many of the "Old Guard" are not interested in seeing pistols extended back to sport on the mainland, as it's unlikely to happen within their life times........
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Gaz

Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act

#168 Post by Gaz »

Sandgroper wrote:I don't think it could happen due to advertising laws - http://www.cap.org.uk/Advertising-Codes ... ories.aspx
10.1.4 guns (including replica guns), gun clubs and offensive weapons. “Offensive weapons” are items made or adapted to cause injury. References to clay pigeon shoots are permitted only as part of a wider range of outdoor pursuits
Who the f*** do this lot think they are?!

Right, angry journo email time...
User avatar
Graham M
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 1010
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:14 pm
Location: Brum
Contact:

Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act

#169 Post by Graham M »

Just out of interest I read this on the Google home page this very morning.
It's an extract from the Olympic Charter..
"The practice of sport is a human right. Every individual must have the possibility of practicing sport, without discrimination of any kind and in the Olympic spirit, which requires mutual understanding with a spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play."

I wonder why it never applies to shooting any???? any????

G.M.
Never argue with an idiot, he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
the running man
Posts: 2004
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 7:05 am
Home club or Range: Bdrpc ebrpc
Contact:

Re: Repealing the Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act

#170 Post by the running man »

Graham M wrote:Just out of interest I read this on the Google home page this very morning.
It's an extract from the Olympic Charter..
"The practice of sport is a human right. Every individual must have the possibility of practicing sport, without discrimination of any kind and in the Olympic spirit, which requires mutual understanding with a spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play."

I wonder why it never applies to shooting any???? any????

G.M.
Becase pp1 Mt 1500 etc etc etc are not Olympic recognised sports....which is a bummer...
When someone says "it's not about the money" you know what? it probably is all about money!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests