Gun Parts Charges Dropped

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
John MH

Gun Parts Charges Dropped

#1 Post by John MH »

Gun Parts Charges Dropped

Rumour has it that the parts were ordered over the internet through a well known US parts and accessories supplier, anyone heard anything.
Gaz

Re: Gun Parts Charges Dropped

#2 Post by Gaz »

Firing pins I can sort of understand, but extractors? Someone in the CPS was really chancing his arm there.
User avatar
Blackstuff
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 7847
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Gun Parts Charges Dropped

#3 Post by Blackstuff »

"The charges all involved components [firing pins and extractors] for the prohibited Glock and Luger handguns which cannot be owned without a licence." Presumably they're referring to the pistols, not the components?

The was clearly no criminal case here as none of the parts were licenceable so there was no breach of the firearms act(s). Questions could be asked as to what she wanted them for, or more usefully, if the persons whom she sold them too could have been tracked and monitored, the police might have actually ended up with a worthwhile court case. troutslapping Considering how easy it is to make a firing pin though i doubt anything would've come of it

Nothing like wasting tax payers money, cheers Police/CPS! :good: :roll:
DVC
User avatar
ovenpaa
Posts: 24689
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:27 pm
Location: Årbjerg, Morsø DK
Contact:

Re: Gun Parts Charges Dropped

#4 Post by ovenpaa »

Luger and Glock parts. Hmmmm..... why would someone go to an airgun shop for parts for an S5 pistol?
/d

Du lytter aldrig til de ord jeg siger. Du ser mig kun for det tøj jeg har paa ...

Shed Journal
northumbrian

Re: Gun Parts Charges Dropped

#5 Post by northumbrian »

ovenpaa wrote:Luger and Glock parts. Hmmmm..... why would someone go to an airgun shop for parts for an S5 pistol?
Smells a bit fishy
John MH

Re: Gun Parts Charges Dropped

#6 Post by John MH »

There is probably more to it than just her involvement, it probably stems from who she supplied them too and what they were then used for. There is also some debate that a firing pin is a pressure bearing part and that you should have good reason to possess one.

She may have been completely clueless or just having a blonde moment when she sold them.
User avatar
ovenpaa
Posts: 24689
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:27 pm
Location: Årbjerg, Morsø DK
Contact:

Re: Gun Parts Charges Dropped

#7 Post by ovenpaa »

Firing pins are a bit of a grey area, my FEO believes they should be restricted as they are pressure bearing. I will ask the London proof Master for his take on this when we speak next.
/d

Du lytter aldrig til de ord jeg siger. Du ser mig kun for det tøj jeg har paa ...

Shed Journal
Pointer

Re: Gun Parts Charges Dropped

#8 Post by Pointer »

It sounds a bit dodgy to me. Technically speaking she has done nothing wrong, but you have to ask yourself WHY the hell did she need such parts? especially in the illegal gun capital of the UK.
forbie

Re: Gun Parts Charges Dropped

#9 Post by forbie »

Bolt face I can undertand as pressure bearing but the firing pin does it really bear any pressure?
User avatar
channel12
Posts: 1005
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:30 pm
Home club or Range: WNSC
Location: Worcestershire
Contact:

Re: Gun Parts Charges Dropped

#10 Post by channel12 »

A key witness pulled out? More likely the Home Office firearms expert they hoped to use in court saw the brief and said "wtf firing pins, you're having laugh aren't you" . It's the old component parts thing again, if it's illegal to possess a glock firing because it's a part of a prohibited gun, how can you then have glock mags for a 9mm lever release?
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests