I think this was pretty much the argument put by Mike Wells' defence team.meles meles wrote:can't one argue that as the bore of a LBR is rifled, it is, de facto, a rifle... ?
There are about half a dozen points that can be made to support the opposite point of view. Either they weren't made in the Wells case, or the jury were not persuaded of their validity. I wasn't there, and as far as I know, nobody has paid for a transcript, so only the summary of the judgment is available to study.