Re: united states armed forces train for taking guns off us
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 2:16 pm
the running man wrote:I believe the Hague Convention relates to military use and "policing" use is exempt.HALODIN wrote:I personally think the US is buying ammo to stop it falling in to civilian hands and being used against them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expanding_ ... tional_lawInternational law[edit]
The Hague Convention of 1899, Declaration III, prohibits the use of expanding bullets in international warfare.[14] This is often incorrectly believed to be prohibited by the Geneva Conventions, but it significantly predates those conventions, and is in fact a continuance of the Declaration of St Petersburg in 1868, which banned exploding projectiles of less than 400 grams.
Until relatively recently, the prohibition on the use of expanding bullets was only applicable to international armed conflicts. The International Committee of the Red Cross's customary international law study contends that customary law now prohibits their use in armed conflicts not of an international character.[15] The adoption of an amendment to Article 8 at the Review Conference of the Rome Statute in Kampala makes the use of expanding bullets in non-international armed conflict a war crime.[16]
There was a report of Israeli snipers being issued soft point ammo under the claim that they were engaged in a policing operation.
I wouldent pay much attention to that, the yanks flout the Geneva convention when it suits them....They used napalm Iin Vietnam and the first gulf war (so i'm told)....besides that's a whole not her thread really.....