Blackstuff;
I'm sorry to say that I totally disagree with the South African/US approach where you can seemingly do an ultra basic one day course and you're free to go on your merry way.

Agreed there.
Anyone who bets their life on a $60 Carry Class is asking for trouble. As you say there are many many areas to it - call it whatever name you like.
The NRA have Personal Protection Inside the Home and Personal Protection Outside the Home which covers concealed carry. The instructor manuals are weighty tomes indeed and there's no way they care covered in a day. They are the BEGINNING of the training, not the end...
Those one day classes are just safety classes and I despair watching people standing square on taking careful aim and trying to shoot tight groups / emptying 17 / 30 round magazines in one go whilst telling me they have just got their CCW and are doing "target practice" or "tactical shooting"...we call it "going to jail and attempted/ actual murder" .
Defensive firearms and competition are different skills though the safety aspect is important...again, this is something that people can only choose to observe, they cannot be fgorced NOT to do dumbass stuff with guns.
Haven't looked in here for a while - seemed full of idots, Airsofters - and a few Americans who really should know better.
http://www.armbritain.com/
Ordnance:
Quote:
As I said, ordinary people can and will train more than cops, either here or in the US. Even in the US some cops will only do the minimum - but rest assured there are some seriously skilled cops pounding a beat!
Thats my point why would you make civilians train more than is required for the police to be carrying on the streets.
Have you spent anyf time with police on ranges doing this type of shooting? Why not? There are umpteen reasons why you would, accountability for one! Maybe police should be better trained?
Quote:
BASIC! IT MUST be continuous and realistic
They seem to mannage here with basic training, we are talking about police on the beat not the SAS or Delta force, no police force trains all its officers to that level.
Maybe they should but they do not have the budget, civvies who take the responsibility of carry seriously will spend the money. However, MONEY should NOT be a barrier to self defence.
As for the chestnut about terrorists - it is just that, and old chestnut with the debate being narrowed to one threat. How about old folks, disabled people, folks with families, those who live in sinkhole estates (no silly comments about "move" ..that isn't always an option. In short people who respect their lives and want to defend them, we're not on about the fools who think it's better for them or their kids to be raped and killed. Anyway, looking at all those reports, NONE of those trerrorists seem to be able to shoot straight - thankfully..whether in semi auto or spraying automatic fire the rounds fired / victim count is thankfully low....