Re: Educate me on Enfields
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:23 pm
Yes and no! :G
From your linked article;
It might be easier to say one is a No6 .303 and a No6 .22lr? :-P
From your linked article;
...and so on. :lol:"IS THIS RIFLE REALLY A 'No.6' " ?' You may well ask .............................. read on and decide for yourself
There are those Enfield historians who consider that the designation 'No.6' given to this model of the Birmingham Small Arms Company's .22in. RF training rifle series was an error in nomenclature made at the time the rifle was produced. However, the fact that the Australian version of the No. 5 "Jungle Carbine" , trialled around two years earlier, was also given the number "6" ( initially they were known as the 'Lightened Pattern' rifles) is not really good reason to draw this conclusion. When the B.S.A Co. was prototyping the variously proposed designs of .22 training rifles, first "off the blocks" was the conversion of the Rifle No.4.
It might be easier to say one is a No6 .303 and a No6 .22lr? :-P