Fugly or not ?
Moderator: dromia
- safetyfirst
- Posts: 2651
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:41 am
- Contact:
Re: Fugly or not ?
Ah, rimless! Ok such a n00b.
-
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2013 11:43 am
- Home club or Range: JSPC; Tayside; NRA
- Location: Scotland
- Contact:
Re: Fugly or not ?
I imagine most shooters would put fairly low power handloads through these, most of the time. A .357 case does not have to any more powerful than a light .38SPL load, after all, and for most purposes, far more useful for target purposes.
BTW, .45ACP CIP limit is 19,000psi -- not so much more than .38SPL. One reason why I'd like one. Big holes, not much recoil or battering to gun/hand. Great for NRA LBR target comps.
Sadly, I know a .45 is unlikely to happen with the Chiappa. I did try the Taurus .45ACP a few years back, but their choice of thin moonclips totally ruined the gun for me (bent far too easily, and spares unobtainable -- and .45AR would not fit.) So I'll keep waiting for a LBR for true one-handed use...
BTW, .45ACP CIP limit is 19,000psi -- not so much more than .38SPL. One reason why I'd like one. Big holes, not much recoil or battering to gun/hand. Great for NRA LBR target comps.
Sadly, I know a .45 is unlikely to happen with the Chiappa. I did try the Taurus .45ACP a few years back, but their choice of thin moonclips totally ruined the gun for me (bent far too easily, and spares unobtainable -- and .45AR would not fit.) So I'll keep waiting for a LBR for true one-handed use...
- GlockworkOrange
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 3:29 pm
- Home club or Range: Parkstone Gun Club
- Location: Winchester
- Contact:
Re: Fugly or not ?
As others have said, there must be a reason Chiappa hasn't released a .44 mag version so far, and I'm fairly sure it's because the alloy frame wouldn't handle a steady diet of full-house ammo. Why most of the UK retailers are stating there will be a .44 version available soon I'm not sure, I haven't seen anything from Chiappa about it.
-
- Posts: 1048
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 9:07 am
- Home club or Range: Isle Target Sports Club
- Location: Cambridgeshire
- Contact:
Re: Fugly or not ?
Why not make it just in .44 Spl then..?? that will satify the majority of Uk LBR owners who just want a bigger hole in the target...??
- GlockworkOrange
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 3:29 pm
- Home club or Range: Parkstone Gun Club
- Location: Winchester
- Contact:
Re: Fugly or not ?
I think .44 spl. would still require a new frame size though, unless it only had a 5 shot cylinder. Maybe they should be selling the .40 S&W version for those who want something a bit bigger than 9mm? I'm not a big fan of the cartridge but it'd make an interesting alternative to the usual revolver calibers.
Re: Fugly or not ?
Even S&W have different frames for .38 and .357/.38 to handle the extra power
-
- Posts: 969
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:33 pm
- Home club or Range: stourport
- Location: Wolverhampton
- Contact:
Re: Fugly or not ?
No they don't. The model 19 "Combat Magnum" in 357 is on the same (K) frame as the model 14 target revolver in 38 special.
Fred
Fred
Re: Fugly or not ?
I dont think S & W has made a K frame 357 for many years .FredB wrote:No they don't. The model 19 "Combat Magnum" in 357 is on the same (K) frame as the model 14 target revolver in 38 special.
Fred
At least until the Classic and Performance Centre versions came out .
-
- Posts: 969
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:33 pm
- Home club or Range: stourport
- Location: Wolverhampton
- Contact:
Re: Fugly or not ?
You have to remember that I am an antique and I shot pistol in the good old days for more than 30 years. In the UK, the 38 / 357 revolver owned by most club members was a model 19 in 357. I have a friend who still has his model 19---he moved it to the Ilse of Man---and he has put many thousands of rounds through it. I use my N frame model 27 once in a long range pistol shoot at ranges up to 300 yds and came second---I was beaten by a guy using a 4" barrel model 19.
I owned two 686 L frame revolvers in 357. In my opinion the L frame Smiths are the best designed and made revolver ever, with one exception: the Webley WG Target.
I also owned a Colt Python: expensive junk compared to the 686. My favourite Colt was a New Service Shooting Master in 357: built to a quality standard umkown in todays guns.
Fred
I owned two 686 L frame revolvers in 357. In my opinion the L frame Smiths are the best designed and made revolver ever, with one exception: the Webley WG Target.
I also owned a Colt Python: expensive junk compared to the 686. My favourite Colt was a New Service Shooting Master in 357: built to a quality standard umkown in todays guns.
Fred
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest