Consistent MV

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Message
Author
RobB

Consistent MV

#1 Post by RobB »

Spent last Sunday afternoon at 1000yrds at Bisley having some quality recoil therapy but also testing a batch of 185 bergers in my FTR rifle.

I noticed a vertical variation on the target which of course can be a number of things, but the one I could easily check was MV. On went the chronograph (V3 Magnetospeed).

Looking at the muzzle velocity and found about a +- 15fps spread centre around 2830fps. So 30fps in total. POI also bore that out. All shots with MV above average were above the centre line, all below were below, including how far above and below so could discount barrel harmonics I believe.
On the target, and born out by the ballistics calculator, translated into +- 0.75 moa. That takes me from a v bull to a 4.

Question is, what should I expect to be able to get to as far as MV consistency?

All cases were ultrasonic cleaned (no more than twice used Lapua Palma small primer. RS 52 weighed to +- 0.06gr. Neck sized. BR 4 primers.

What I didn't do was weigh the Bergers. Will do that next time.

Anything else?


Sent from my boing using "An application"
Triffid
Posts: 407
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:36 pm
Home club or Range: Wey Valley
Contact:

Re: Consistent MV

#2 Post by Triffid »

He only looked at large rifle primers, but Laurie Holland found they made quite a difference to the velocity spread:
http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/201 ... -and-more/.

Then batching the brass by weight or volume to ensure consistent case pressure and neck-turning to ensure consistent neck tension.

Triffid
User avatar
20series
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 4941
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:42 am
Home club or Range: Oundle R&PC
Location: Chelveston, Northants
Contact:

Re: Consistent MV

#3 Post by 20series »

Personally I wouldn't bother weighing out the Berger bullets you'll get board of how consistent they are...

it could be variance in your neck tensio

Alan
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools!!
Douglas Adams, 1952-2001 RIP
StanDeasy

Re: Consistent MV

#4 Post by StanDeasy »

Inputting your numbers into Berger's own ballistics calculator gives a predicted elevation spread of about +- 0.375 moa i.e. half of the actual result on the target. So the other half must be due to some other factor.
User avatar
WelshShooter
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 1812
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 9:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Consistent MV

#5 Post by WelshShooter »

What about the relative temperature while shooting? Some powders are not so consistent during colder weather, for example, Ramshot Tac doesn't seem to perform so well compared to the likes of Varget.
RobB

Re: Consistent MV

#6 Post by RobB »

WelshShooter wrote:What about the relative temperature while shooting? Some powders are not so consistent during colder weather, for example, Ramshot Tac doesn't seem to perform so well compared to the likes of Varget.
it was only me on the target with no delay in shooting and therefore little temp change between shots. So I'm discounting temp change.


Sent from my boing using "An application"
StanDeasy

Re: Consistent MV

#7 Post by StanDeasy »

I have just noticed that you are using RS52 propellant. This was not designed to be used with heavy bullets in 308Win and could be responsible for your vertical stringing, due to random pressure spikes.

I would advise you to switch to a more suitable powder. If you have any doubts, speak to Nigel Cole-Hawkins the UK RS distributor.
RobB

Re: Consistent MV

#8 Post by RobB »

StanDeasy wrote:Inputting your numbers into Berger's own ballistics calculator gives a predicted elevation spread of about +- 0.375 moa i.e. half of the actual result on the target. So the other half must be due to some other factor.
taking out the 2 or 3 outliers it was probably closer to +- 0.5 moa (human error, Sun coming out and harmonics in there somewhere). But even +- 0.375, would that be acceptable for F Class FTR? Bit of wind and your back into 4's. I'd prefer if the MV spread wasn't that large.

Sounds like I need to neck turn. Never done that yet.


Sent from my boing using "An application"
RobB

Re: Consistent MV

#9 Post by RobB »

Thanks for the suggestions so far. Things to think about


Sent from my boing using "An application"
StanDeasy

Re: Consistent MV

#10 Post by StanDeasy »

You need to get your velocity spread down, ideally into single figures. I don't see neck turning helping that very much.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: drone and 2 guests