A modern .303
Moderator: dromia
- daman
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 12:11 am
- Home club or Range: NRA, BASC, BDS, Larbert, UKPSA, Recoil
- Location: Falkirk
- Contact:
A modern .303
I'll just leave this here and see how long before the comments get it moved to GOM
(Warning, cannot be unseen)
https://twitter.com/AusGovGunFacts/stat ... 64/photo/1
(Warning, cannot be unseen)
https://twitter.com/AusGovGunFacts/stat ... 64/photo/1
Re: A modern .303
That is definitely NWS - what a dogs dinner that is. No need for this to be moved, it's shooting related
If someone is capable of doing that to a gun they have no shame at all.




If someone is capable of doing that to a gun they have no shame at all.
Political Correctness is the language of lies, written by the corrupt , spoken by the inept!
Re: A modern .303
Oh dear....
- 20series
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 4941
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:42 am
- Home club or Range: Oundle R&PC
- Location: Chelveston, Northants
- Contact:
Re: A modern .303
My eyes, my eyes burn them with acid it can't be more painful than that... aaarggh aaarggh
Alan
Alan
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools!!
Douglas Adams, 1952-2001 RIP
Douglas Adams, 1952-2001 RIP
- WelshShooter
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 1811
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 9:45 pm
- Contact:
Re: A modern .303
Unfortunately that's not even the worst one I've seen... This one comes close to it though.


Re: A modern .303
I quite like that one.WelshShooter wrote:Unfortunately that's not even the worst one I've seen... This one comes close to it though.

-
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 3:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: A modern .303
At least they haven't put a scope on it!daman wrote:I'll just leave this here and see how long before the comments get it moved to GOM
(Warning, cannot be unseen)
https://twitter.com/AusGovGunFacts/stat ... 64/photo/1
Re: A modern .303
Actually the one in this picture is not .303 its .308/7.62x51 the magazine is wrong for .303.Alpha1 wrote:I quite like that one.WelshShooter wrote:Unfortunately that's not even the worst one I've seen... This one comes close to it though.
Sorry.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests