Indeed, the Chief Inspector who was brought in to "sort things out" actually made it worse and has been moved "sideways" to another position. The replacement has stated he wants Durham to be the strictest licensing department in the country. I really don't have a problem with that if only they'd adhere to H.O. guidance and firearms law instead of making things up as they go and insisting on things like additional medical forms etc. in an effort to try and show how good they are at their jobs (which they aren't) and protecting the public from us nasty shooters.
Also, from what I've been told, none of the additional staff recently brought in have any experience of firearms licensing either.
The 1972 Mckay Report on Firearms Control
Moderator: dromia
Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
- phaedra1106
- Posts: 3429
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:37 pm
- Location: Just outside Sacriston (the nice bit!)
- Contact:
Re: The 1972 Mckay Report on Firearms Control
There's room for all Gods creatures, next to the mash and gravy :)
- Blackstuff
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 7847
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
- Contact:
Re: The 1972 Mckay Report on Firearms Control
Considering what was said by at the inquiry the whole department should've been cleared out as far as i'm concerned. Even if the new staff didn't have any previous firearms experience anyone with a modicum of knowledge could bring the new staff up to the same speed as their predocessors after a weeks training.Sim G wrote:Point taken, Mark. But, what's more preferable, drag someone over the coals, kick their arse and then move on with a line drawn under it and lessons learned, or, sack them then have to bring someone new in who doesn't have the experience or know the history, only that their predesessor what binned for allowing them something they shouldn't really have....?
As Jeff said, i'm not bothered about them making Durham "the strictest in the country" as long as that means they strictly go by the book (guidance and legislation), unfortunately thats not what i think is being implied at all, more Durham would be the most restrictive FLD in the country and they'll make things up to meet that agenda

DVC
Re: The 1972 Mckay Report on Firearms Control
Blackstuff wrote: Even if the new staff didn't have any previous firearms experience anyone with a modicum of knowledge could bring the new staff up to the same speed as their predocessors after a weeks training.
No, I don't think you could. Our sport has a phenominal technical and legal aspect to it, look at some of the questions that are asked on here from some that have a vast experience of the sport. Imagine that being compounded by staff with no experience.
Unless someone is dishonest or corrupt, I generally have issue with the "heads should roll" ethos so often touted. So much more can be lost than gained....
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Re: The 1972 Mckay Report on Firearms Control
https://ukshootingnews.wordpress.com/20 ... ing-party/
The composition of the working party is now online. It was mostly police constables, with a handful of Home Office bods.
What really worries me is that the McKay Review was carried out by HM Inspector of Constabulary (John McKay being the top dog there). Guess what organisation is currently reviewing the firearms licensing system behind closed doors?!?
The composition of the working party is now online. It was mostly police constables, with a handful of Home Office bods.
What really worries me is that the McKay Review was carried out by HM Inspector of Constabulary (John McKay being the top dog there). Guess what organisation is currently reviewing the firearms licensing system behind closed doors?!?
Re: The 1972 Mckay Report on Firearms Control
Well, Her Majesty's Inspector of Constabulary is now Sir Tom Windsor. A man who was described by Keith Vaz at the Home Select Committee as "Wholly unconvincing". Likewise, the Police Federation found a number of examples in Windsors review of policing as being, well, lies.
Should he apply these same standards to firearms law, prepare for something more damaging than the McKay report....
Should he apply these same standards to firearms law, prepare for something more damaging than the McKay report....
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
- phaedra1106
- Posts: 3429
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:37 pm
- Location: Just outside Sacriston (the nice bit!)
- Contact:
Re: The 1972 Mckay Report on Firearms Control
For anyone in any doubt of the level of Durhams incompetence or who would like a DIY guide on how not to run a firearms department I've put a copy of the report here,
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/103 ... report.PDF
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/103 ... report.PDF
There's room for all Gods creatures, next to the mash and gravy :)
Re: The 1972 Mckay Report on Firearms Control
phaedra1106 wrote:For anyone in any doubt of the level of Durhams incompetence or who would like a DIY guide on how not to run a firearms department I've put a copy of the report here,
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/103 ... report.PDF
Checks carried out by PC Cobain confirmed that Mr Atherton was a member of a clay pigeon shooting club, therefore satisfying Mr Atherton’s ‘good reason’ for acquiring a shotgun.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests