New British Army Rifle?

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Message
Author
ordnance
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:00 pm
Location: N. Ireland. UK.
Contact:

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#261 Post by ordnance »

Exactly - the award for the most ridiculous dick waver and pontificator on this topic goes to Ordnance :p
Back it up , unlike some others show what I posted claiming anything regards the SA/80 regarding experience etc. Do you think its an unreasonable question to ask the person claiming its so good what they find so good about the rifle. seems a reasonable question to me. PS You know what they say it takes one to know one, your post proves that. green55
I have no understanding or experience of this subject, please forgive me and ignore anything that I've posted.
OK avoiding the question there is a surprise, why didn't you admit that at the start, better late than never explains a lot of your posts at least at last you are being honest. goodjob
Last edited by ordnance on Mon Apr 06, 2015 2:10 pm, edited 2 times in total.
DW58

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#262 Post by DW58 »

Are there such things as Badger Walts, i.e. Oomans walting as Badgers? shakeshout
User avatar
meles meles
Posts: 6335
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
Home club or Range: HBSA
Location: Underground
Contact:

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#263 Post by meles meles »

Werebadgers ?
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun



Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
Airbrush
Posts: 1251
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:26 am
Home club or Range: Nra
Location: Devon
Contact:

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#264 Post by Airbrush »

Ok time to put this to bed, the M4 is far superior to the L85 A2 because it looks so much cooler, pew, pew. :run:
DW58

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#265 Post by DW58 »

ordnance wrote:
Exactly - the award for the most ridiculous dick waver and pontificator on this topic goes to Ordnance :p
Back it up , unlike some others show what I posted claiming anything regards the SA/80 regarding experience etc. Do you think its an unreasonable question to ask the person claiming its so good what they find so good about the rifle. seems a reasonable question to me. PS You know what they say it takes one to know one, your post proves that. green55
signfunnypost

Image
User avatar
DL.
Posts: 1634
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:24 am
Contact:

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#266 Post by DL. »

Reliability - I've had stoppages with the A1, mostly magazine related because the radway green aluminium magazines were tonk, and a poor substitute for the colt mags the rifle was designed for.

I also had the bolt handle stoppage where the case bounced back into the ejection port.

The A2 - things got better, but I must have been issued a rifle with the mightiest return spring known to the REME because it was prone to short stroking.

I've had a rifle fail to chamber a round and had the 'dead man's click' fortunately on the ranges - unfortunately during a competition. lol

Things are constantly improving, I realise that the immediate action drill includes a lot of magazine related drills during the weapon handling tests. Issuing EMAGs will be a help I expect.

Someone told me last year what the pamphlet dictated people should clean the A2 at, I can't remember the exact number - but it was over a thousand rounds.

When the A2 was trialled there were tests conducted in Saudi that were written up in a military doctrine journal,and even with burying the rifle in sand, the instances of stoppages were very, very low.

Things are getting better all the time. But do remember - real men go belt fed! lol
Fedaykin

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#267 Post by Fedaykin »

DW58 wrote:Are there such things as Badger Walts, i.e. Oomans walting as Badgers? shakeshout
Ah now this is something I know about, they call themselves Otherkin.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otherkin

Five shades of creepy if you ask me kukkuk
Fedaykin

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#268 Post by Fedaykin »

Airbrush wrote:Ok time to put this to bed, the M4 is far superior to the L85 A2 because it looks so much cooler, pew, pew. :run:
Talk about tossing a grenade into the room :p
Airbrush
Posts: 1251
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:26 am
Home club or Range: Nra
Location: Devon
Contact:

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#269 Post by Airbrush »

Fedaykin wrote:
Airbrush wrote:Ok time to put this to bed, the M4 is far superior to the L85 A2 because it looks so much cooler, pew, pew. :run:
Talk about tossing a grenade into the room :p
Hey, did Seal Team 6 use the L85A2, I rest my case. green55
Fedaykin

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#270 Post by Fedaykin »

DL. wrote:
Things are getting better all the time. But do remember - real men go belt fed! lol
Belt fed now you are talking!

On a related matter, this is what I was talking about yesterday DW58. The new machine gun selected by the Danish Army as their GPMG the US Ordnance M60E6:

http://www.usord.com/weapons/m60e6

This video by Larry Vickers with US Ordnance shows the changes made:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIIicHWwFQo

What it does show that guns with a reputation for general badness can be reworked into something better, which rather parallels with the SA80 experience.

Oh and for those inclined the Slo-Mo video is cool! A bit of machine gun porn...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTwyP2UUtFA
Last edited by Fedaykin on Mon Apr 06, 2015 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests