New British Army Rifle?

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Locked
Message
Author
John MH

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#191 Post by John MH »

Eh?
ordnance
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:00 pm
Location: N. Ireland. UK.
Contact:

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#192 Post by ordnance »

Eh?

Some versions have an ALO or "automatic lockout", a small projection at the base of the trigger. This was first included on the Irish Defence Forces variant of the rifle, and soon after, the Australian Defence Forces variant. In the exposed position the ALO stops the trigger being squeezed past the semi-automatic position. If needed, the ALO can be pushed up to permit automatic fire
.
Sixshot6

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#193 Post by Sixshot6 »

John MH wrote:Eh?
I explain it and then you still do this, like you were doing before. At this point, I'm not trying to boast, be an armchair general or anything. Just stating that is one of the differences between Aussie and normal (i.e original Austrian design) Aug's. The fact that you're doing this again and have said Eh, twice in row shows to me that you have very little in the way of manners. I am supposed to have a hard time seeing social cues and yet I know not to do that. I don't care if you think this personal but right now I'm being as civil as I can be. So stop doing this, if you are what you say you (and on the record I have no military service whatsoever, it wasn't the place for me and I would have been too much of a liability in a place like Iraq or Afghanistan. I don't have the mentality to be the person needed for that) gives you no excuse to do this. I answered your question in a Civil manner and you still do this.

Next time I might not be so civil, so I ask one last time for you to stop doing this and show some courtesy.
Sixshot6

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#194 Post by Sixshot6 »

ordnance wrote:Eh?

Some versions have an ALO or "automatic lockout", a small projection at the base of the trigger. This was first included on the Irish Defence Forces variant of the rifle, and soon after, the Australian Defence Forces variant. In the exposed position the ALO stops the trigger being squeezed past the semi-automatic position. If needed, the ALO can be pushed up to permit automatic fire
.
Exactly Ordnance. He seems to be a loop at times. I only hope I can stay Civil this time.
John MH

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#195 Post by John MH »

ordnance wrote:Eh?

Some versions have an ALO or "automatic lockout", a small projection at the base of the trigger. This was first included on the Irish Defence Forces variant of the rifle, and soon after, the Australian Defence Forces variant. In the exposed position the ALO stops the trigger being squeezed past the semi-automatic position. If needed, the ALO can be pushed up to permit automatic fire
.
Inteweb quote, no practical experience?
Sixshot6

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#196 Post by Sixshot6 »

And thanks for giving a bit more background on what I said, but I thought I was being clear about some versions having what to me is a selector switch to aid with training the use of full auto fire a bit better. Thank you, you and Fedyakin are the most civil people on this board.
John MH

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#197 Post by John MH »

Sixshot6 wrote:
John MH wrote:Eh?
I explain it and then you still do this, like you were doing before. At this point, I'm not trying to boast, be an armchair general or anything. Just stating that is one of the differences between Aussie and normal (i.e original Austrian design) Aug's. The fact that you're doing this again and have said Eh, twice in row shows to me that you have very little in the way of manners. I am supposed to have a hard time seeing social cues and yet I know not to do that. I don't care if you think this personal but right now I'm being as civil as I can be. So stop doing this, if you are what you say you (and on the record I have no military service whatsoever, it wasn't the place for me and I would have been too much of a liability in a place like Iraq or Afghanistan. I don't have the mentality to be the person needed for that) gives you no excuse to do this. I answered your question in a Civil manner and you still do this.

Next time I might not be so civil, so I ask one last time for you to stop doing this and show some courtesy.
Not being rude, just don't know what you are posting about. Is it interweb or CoD knowledge or hands on?
Sixshot6

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#198 Post by Sixshot6 »

John MH wrote:
ordnance wrote:Eh?

Some versions have an ALO or "automatic lockout", a small projection at the base of the trigger. This was first included on the Irish Defence Forces variant of the rifle, and soon after, the Australian Defence Forces variant. In the exposed position the ALO stops the trigger being squeezed past the semi-automatic position. If needed, the ALO can be pushed up to permit automatic fire
.
Inteweb quote, no practical experience?
that's like criticizing someone for driving a car without knowing the inns and outs of mechanisms. At the end of the day, you don't need experience to have an idea of how something works and most of either don't have access to all the fancy manuals or schematics so we use the web for what its for. To find information and improve our knowledge. Stop being so snide.
Sixshot6

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#199 Post by Sixshot6 »

John MH wrote:
Sixshot6 wrote:
John MH wrote:Eh?
I explain it and then you still do this, like you were doing before. At this point, I'm not trying to boast, be an armchair general or anything. Just stating that is one of the differences between Aussie and normal (i.e original Austrian design) Aug's. The fact that you're doing this again and have said Eh, twice in row shows to me that you have very little in the way of manners. I am supposed to have a hard time seeing social cues and yet I know not to do that. I don't care if you think this personal but right now I'm being as civil as I can be. So stop doing this, if you are what you say you (and on the record I have no military service whatsoever, it wasn't the place for me and I would have been too much of a liability in a place like Iraq or Afghanistan. I don't have the mentality to be the person needed for that) gives you no excuse to do this. I answered your question in a Civil manner and you still do this.

Next time I might not be so civil, so I ask one last time for you to stop doing this and show some courtesy.
Not being rude, just don't know what you are posting about. Is it interweb or CoD knowledge or hands on?
I'm not even a fan of call of duty. I hate those games. Not everyone under 40 plays them. Hell I regard them as the Mcdonalds of the video game world, no substance at all. Right now you are making generalizations and that is not on.
John MH

Re: New British Army Rifle?

#200 Post by John MH »

Why not?
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests