Yes that is correct, I read one post from a Smith on another site who got through two reamers before he learned this.Dannywayoflife wrote:I believe they just require carbide reemers to chamber them :)
Lothar Walther Barrels.
Moderator: dromia
Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Re: Lothar Walther Barrels.
Re: Lothar Walther Barrels.
I have 2 stainless, a new 6.5 and a 6BR that's been round the galaxy...........both as accurate as my Bartlein 308.
If the smith knows what he's doing and has the right kit, there's no problem machining the stainless versions.
H/man
If the smith knows what he's doing and has the right kit, there's no problem machining the stainless versions.
H/man
Re: Lothar Walther Barrels.
The issues with machining LW barrels seems to be fuelled as much by rumour as direct experience, I have special steel LW barrel due in soon and will be using a 'normal' reamer to chamber it.
Re: Lothar Walther Barrels.
I have two LW match barrels in 6,5x55SE shooting Keppeler rifles and they seem to be fine. My only complain is they require a lot of cleaning.
Re: Lothar Walther Barrels.
David,ovenpaa wrote:The issues with machining LW barrels seems to be fuelled as much by rumour as direct experience, I have special steel LW barrel due in soon and will be using a 'normal' reamer to chamber it.
Absolutely.
I have once chambered 30 LW barrels in one run....and the same reamer still works fine 20 years afrer....
Hereunder extract from a recent post:
R.G.C
The LW barrels have an excellent reputation in Europe and at Bisley in particular.
They do not interest gunplumbers as they require a little more care and skill than the free machining 416 and mostly last longer…..
Hard on reamers could be only a point if reamers are simple HSS and not HSS+Co.
Hereunder an extract of a document I wrote some time ago on barrel steels.
I point I have no interests in the LM business…
R.G.C
-1°--Starting from the material :
Except one european manufacturer, for corrosion-resistant steel (the term Stainless is inadequate for the 400 series steels), all uses the same alloy, and it is the AISI/ASTM/SAE 416R (Euronorm X12CrS13 or Werkstoff Nr 1.4005).
Barrelmakers may say theirs are ultra-sonic tested, aircraft quality, quality certified….., it remain the same metal, as made by a few plants worldwide. Might be sold eventually under multiple labels and trade names, the physical, chemical and mechanical properties remain exactly those of the same alloy closely defined jn the norms.
This metal is the barrel makers preferred, not for its qualities as barrel steel, but for its machine-ability, as alloyed with sulphur. A blessing for the machinists, but on the detriment of the qualities one should normally expect from a barrel: Quite soft, limited friction capacity, prone to internal hollow corrosion… But it polishes so well and easily that the shine of it attracts at first..
One large (the largest In Europe in terms of target barrels) barrelmaker, Lothar Walther in Germany, uses a different alloy, AISI 420 (EuroNorm X20Cr13 or W/Nr 1.4021), slightly higher in Carbon content (0,20% as to 0;12% of the 416) and in Chromium (13% as to 12% of the 416), but no sulphur addition, and which possess all the properties one could ask for such a purpose. Walther’s primary business is deep bore drilling to the closest tolerances, and they master this process over many decades and 3 generations.
Their ‘savoir-faire” is unique, and they are the only capable of using industrially this alloy. It might well be not too much liked by those who have to machine it afterwards for chambering and threading, but, quality-wise, the result is certainly worth the effort. Does this makes a better shooting barrel? Certainly not, but longer lasting no doubt the answer is ‘yes’….
-The 416, supplied in annealed condition, is about:
Brinell Hardness : 170
Rm: 630MPa
Modulus of Elasticity: 200GPa
Thermal conductivity: 25W/m-k
-While the 420 is:
Brinell Hardness 205
Rm: 725MPa
Modulus of Elasticity: 200GPa.
Thermal conductivity: 25W/m-k
-At least one mill (Crucible) claims having a specific brand of 416 for barrels, but others, at least 2 in USA and 3 in Europe, are offering exactly the same material and under the same alloy specifications and under same supply Q.C and traceability conditions.
The Walther 420 is supplied by Boehler-Udderlohn from Austira under Walther’s specifications.
Just a quick mention here of the CrMo steels used for barrels . The various alloys used are all of higher mechanical and physical properties than the 416, and even to the 420 to a lesser extend.
-A typical brand is:
Brinnell hardness: 225 to 241
Rm: 1000MPa
Modulus of elasticity: 205GPa
Thermal conductivity: 43W/m-K
This alloy is harder than 416, have a lesser friction coefficient and much better thermal conductivity (important). It is however much less favoured despite the above superiorities..
_________________
R.G.C.
Re: Lothar Walther Barrels.
Does LW barrel need more cleaning due to its different alloy? I rather let the chemicals do their job but it takes me "ages", I mean full afternoon, for LW barrel decent cleaning.
Re: Lothar Walther Barrels.
I have shot out several LW barrels and they need/take no more cleaning than any other Stainless barrel. If you run/break the barrel in properly it should take no more than 10 minutes to clean it. I actually think that once run in they clean easier than other stainless barrels.Hubert wrote:Does LW barrel need more cleaning due to its different alloy? I rather let the chemicals do their job but it takes me "ages", I mean full afternoon, for LW barrel decent cleaning.
- meles meles
- Posts: 6335
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
- Home club or Range: HBSA
- Location: Underground
- Contact:
Re: Lothar Walther Barrels.
Run in ?
Don't start us on that owd chestnut, ooman ! A properly made barrel requires no running in. A barrel that requires running in hasn't been made right !
Don't start us on that owd chestnut, ooman ! A properly made barrel requires no running in. A barrel that requires running in hasn't been made right !
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun
Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun
Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
Re: Lothar Walther Barrels.
It's not the barrel but the leade that needs running in. No matter how good your reamer, no matter how good the machinist, when the chamber is cut the lead will have machining marks. Look at these with a boroscope and they look like the teeth on a b****** file. It is these marks that you are evening out/removing by running in your barrel. This is the area that will attract most fouling if not done properly.meles meles wrote:Run in ?
Don't start us on that owd chestnut, ooman ! A properly made barrel requires no running in. A barrel that requires running in hasn't been made right !
Are you really going to tell the likes of Krieger, Bartlein, Obermeyer etc that they are wrong and that the advice they give to their customers is bull.
I know who and what I believe and you are not a one of them. I trust my barrel makers,I trust my machinist/rifle smith. I don't trust striped mono-chrome mammals, who have no pedigree.
Re: Lothar Walther Barrels.
.308 LW barrels come already chambered, the rear of the barrel needs to be machined to set correct headspace. Of course that doesn't necessarily mean that leade doesn't have machining marks.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests