TJC wrote:Chump !
Paris was a clear example of why concealed carry should be allowed for responsible citizens. Plenty of videos of people watching and recording, none of anyone trying to either help or save themselves. It might have been a different outcome if some in the CH office had concealed carry but then again & somewhat ironically, the liberal media wouldn't tolerate that.
TJC and Chuck lets just say for a moment that concealed carry was permitted in France, and lets say half the people in the morning meeting were concealed carry cleared and had their pistols on them. Do you think that in that morning meeting when two men burst in with total surprise armed with self loading rifles the fact they are also armed is going to make one iota of difference to the outcome?
In the end I am extremely weary of talking about the American 2nd amendment as it places that country in a completely different world but when it comes to guns but in Europe there is virtually zero public or political desire to allow the public to carry guns for self defence. Arguing for it only makes our very small community look dangerous in the eyes of the public and comments like yours could only be exploited by those who wish to restrict our sport even further. Dynamic shooting disciplines like Practical Rifle are already at a legislative knife edge.
Why even argue for something which has zero chance of ever coming into law?