Standard Primers with AR?

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Message
Author
SevenSixTwo

Standard Primers with AR?

#1 Post by SevenSixTwo »

Does anyone have problems with using standard commercial primers in military (AR) actions? I've read that CCI have specialised primers to minimise slam fire:

http://www.cci-ammunition.com/products/ ... aspx?id=30

tesnews
User avatar
Individual
Posts: 545
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 5:18 pm
Location: Surrey
Contact:

Re: Standard Primers with AR?

#2 Post by Individual »

SevenSixTwo wrote:Does anyone have problems with using standard commercial primers in military (AR) actions?
No. But then I haven't got a military (AR) action, its just an ordinary one.
User avatar
channel12
Posts: 1005
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:30 pm
Home club or Range: WNSC
Location: Worcestershire
Contact:

Re: Standard Primers with AR?

#3 Post by channel12 »

SevenSixTwo wrote:Does anyone have problems with using standard commercial primers in military (AR) actions? I've read that CCI have specialised primers to minimise slam fire:

http://www.cci-ammunition.com/products/ ... aspx?id=30

tesnews

No






I've not experienced a slam fire with my AR using standard small rifle primers.
SevenSixTwo

Re: Standard Primers with AR?

#4 Post by SevenSixTwo »

Ok, thanks. If I can get them, however, I'd rather not take the risk. Anyone know who carries them?
John MH

Re: Standard Primers with AR?

#5 Post by John MH »

No, not much call for them in the UK.

If you are going to all this bother to replicate Milsurp ammo why not just buy Milsurp ammo?
SevenSixTwo

Re: Standard Primers with AR?

#6 Post by SevenSixTwo »

John MH wrote:No, not much call for them in the UK.
Why isn't there?

http://www.cci-ammunition.com/products/ ... aspx?id=30
Military-style semi-auto rifles seldom have firing pin retraction springs. If care is not used in assembling ammunition, a “slam-fire” can occur before the bolt locks. The military arsenals accomplish this using different techniques and components—including different primer sensitivity specifications—from their commercial counterparts. CCI makes rifle primers for commercial sale that matches military sensitivity specs that reduce the chance of a slam-fire when other factors go out of control*. If you’re reloading for a military semi-auto, look to CCI Military primers.
*Effective slam-fire prevention requires more than special primers. Headspace, chamber condition, firing pin shape and protrusion, bolt velocity, cartridge case condition, and other factors can affect slam-fire potential.
If you are going to all this bother to replicate Milsurp ammo why not just buy Milsurp ammo?
[sigh]... :roll:
John MH

Re: Standard Primers with AR?

#7 Post by John MH »

Because there isn't. But good luck in trying to get some.
Andy632

Re: Standard Primers with AR?

#8 Post by Andy632 »

SevenSixTwo wrote:Does anyone have problems with using standard commercial primers in military (AR) actions? I've read that CCI have specialised primers to minimise slam fire:

http://www.cci-ammunition.com/products/ ... aspx?id=30

tesnews
Why not do a survey of all of us who actually use & reload for a straight pull AR and ask if we've ever experienced any slamfires????

I've never had one yet with any of the ARs I've had or have now!


(I have had one with my M14 though which went into the mantlet :oops: )
User avatar
Dark Skies
Posts: 2857
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:02 am
Home club or Range: NRA
Contact:

Re: Standard Primers with AR?

#9 Post by Dark Skies »

SevenSixTwo wrote:
John MH wrote:No, not much call for them in the UK.
Why isn't there?
Because slam fires are predominantly an issue with military rifles that have selective fire and free-floating firing pins.
The momentum of a non-retarded firing pin slamming into a primer and causing the rifle to fire unintended isn't an issue with the straight pull bolt action versions of the AR we shoot in the UK.
"I don't like my job and I don't think I'm gonna go anymore."
SevenSixTwo

Re: Standard Primers with AR?

#10 Post by SevenSixTwo »

Andy632 wrote:Why not do a survey of all of us who actually use & reload for a straight pull AR and ask if we've ever experienced any slamfires????
I thought I was doing just that! :good:
Dark Skies wrote:
SevenSixTwo wrote:
John MH wrote:No, not much call for them in the UK.
Why isn't there?
Because slam fires are predominantly an issue with military rifles that have selective fire and free-floating firing pins. The momentum of a non-retarded firing pin slamming into a primer and causing the rifle to fire unintended isn't an issue with the straight pull bolt action versions of the AR we shoot in the UK.
Why not? The pin is just as free-floaty in a straight-pull as one in a select fire rifle.

My concern piqued because CCI don't recommend use of SR 400s in the AR-15. Also just found this:

http://www.sksboards.com/smf/index.php?topic=56422.0

According to that, CCI 200 LR primers, contrary to CCI's advice, are good to go in .308 but reinforces that the 400s for .223 should not be used.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests