Odd looking .303 advice req.

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Message
Author
User avatar
legs748
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:08 pm
Home club or Range: Mattersey R&PC
Location: North Nottinghamshire
Contact:

Odd looking .303 advice req.

#1 Post by legs748 »

After using up my stock of privi I went out and bought some hornady .303 174gr btfmj, I planned to load a batch today but after assembling the first round it just looked odd, like the cannulure is in the wrong place. Case is Remington and contains 39gr of vit 140, bullet is seated to 3.070" oal.Image

Shouldn't the groove sit on the edge of the case neck? I pulled the privi bullet from my inert bench round to compare and they have the cannulure in a completely different place.Image privi on the left, hornady on the right.
Also the box states the hornady to be .3105 yet they mic up at a full .312"Image
Are these bullets wrong, packaged wrong or just plain wrong? Or is the location of the groove immaterial?

Any ideas or advice gratefully received.
It was working when i left it...........
saddler

Re: Odd looking .303 advice req.

#2 Post by saddler »

They're defective

Send them to me & I'll safely dispose of them for you
User avatar
mag41uk
Posts: 1847
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:50 pm
Home club or Range: Aldershot R & P Club
Location: Reading
Contact:

Re: Odd looking .303 advice req.

#3 Post by mag41uk »

Saddler is such a wag!

They are fine. I have used quite a few of these.

Tony
Dougan

Re: Odd looking .303 advice req.

#4 Post by Dougan »

Interesting...the crimping grove it definitely in the wrong place for a standard .303 'British'...at the risk of a daft question (to all) are there other .303 types of ammunition that this bullet could be intended for?
Chapuis
Posts: 1676
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 11:32 am
Contact:

Re: Odd looking .303 advice req.

#5 Post by Chapuis »

It's not really a crimping groove just ignore it. It is really just a means of holding the jacket to the core.
User avatar
jcampbellsmith
Posts: 441
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:20 pm
Home club or Range: BDS, L&BRC
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Odd looking .303 advice req.

#6 Post by jcampbellsmith »

If you want to crimp them using the groove, then seat the bullet more deeply and work your load up again. Looking in the Hornady Manual (8th Ed), the two other .303 bullets listed also have a similarly positioned cannelure.

Looking further at the manual it lists COL of 2.980 for the #3131 bullet.

Regards JCS
User avatar
dromia
Site Admin
Posts: 20226
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
Contact:

Re: Odd looking .303 advice req.

#7 Post by dromia »

Why would you want to crimp anyway?
Image

Come on Bambi get some

Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad

Fecking stones

Real farmers don't need subsidies

Cow's farts matter!

For fine firearms and requisites visit

http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
Laurie

Re: Odd looking .303 advice req.

#8 Post by Laurie »

Dougan wrote:Interesting...the crimping grove it definitely in the wrong place for a standard .303 'British'...at the risk of a daft question (to all) are there other .303 types of ammunition that this bullet could be intended for?
7.62X545R, 7.7X58mm Arisaka, 7.65X53mm Mauser, .303 Savage use 0.310-0.311" bullets. As Dromia says though, why bother? You neither need to crimp, nor want to, unless maybe loading for an automatic weapon
Dougan

Re: Odd looking .303 advice req.

#9 Post by Dougan »

jcampbellsmith wrote:If you want to crimp them using the groove, then seat the bullet more deeply and work your load up again. Looking in the Hornady Manual (8th Ed), the two other .303 bullets listed also have a similarly positioned cannelure.

Looking further at the manual it lists COL of 2.980 for the #3131 bullet.

Regards JCS
Thanks for that - Unfortunately I haven't got the Hornady manual, as I'd like to see the loads (don't suppose there's one for Viht powder is there?) - That seating depth is 90 thou deeper that those normally advised for '.303 British', which would put the grove nearer the neck...

...Legs...what does one look like seated to 2.980...?
Dougan

Re: Odd looking .303 advice req.

#10 Post by Dougan »

dromia wrote:Why would you want to crimp anyway?
I wouldn't...I totally agree on that...

...but reloading suppliers do make factory and taper crimps for rifle cartridges, and manuals describe how to use them; so I assume that some folk do crimp, and I've seen factory ammo that is lightly crimped into a shallow groove...

...I'm still curious as to Hornady's purpose for the groove, and if they intended that bullet to be used for '.303 British' loads...?
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests