Agreed, but it lets you measure those 5 kernel grains and if you're looking to recreate the perfect shot, accuracy is everything. I appreciate if you have his TV/camera setup you can see the effect of each grain on the balance, but I doubt my eyes will be able to focus on the balance to that degree, especially in artificial light. Hence leaning towards an LCD screen. Point taken about reliability though!
I suppose the ultimate question is, if you loaded 5 shots of .308 with 42.1 grains and then another 5 shots with 42.18 grains, would the moa differ between groups? The general consensus seems to be no, but it's hard to comprehend it doesn't have any effect even if it's just 1mm @ 100 yards. At 1000 yards that then starts to make a difference. My brains telling me if I should be as accurate as the propellant allows.
1066 wrote:Many beam scales will weigh well within .1 of a grain. There are just about five single kernels of Varget to .1 grain so having a digital scale that can weigh to .001 grain is pretty academic unless you are intending to start cutting individual kernels.
No matter what you pay for digital scales they will eventually let you down. I have an old but reliable Ohaus lab scale that, when new, were an expensive item. The LCD readout is now starting to break up, Ohaus say they are obsolete and there are no spares available but are happy to give me $200 off a new $3,000 scale. I have beam scales that are 50 years old and as accurate as the day they were made.
This is one of my scales in action, a humble, bottom of the range RCBS 502.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnVOoGd1bDU