
308 155 gr SMK load
Moderator: dromia
Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.
Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.
Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Re: 308 155 gr SMK load
Thanks I think I was being a bit conservative on powder , ill push it up and see if I get another node ,
, Ian

Re: 308 155 gr SMK load
I am getting 3065 FPS (through a 30" FTR barrel with a barnard action) with the 2156.
Set 16 Thou off
47.3 of N140. Lapua Palma brass and CCI BR4 primers.
I was using 47.8gr but in reality there was little gained.
Oddly enough, I have found that my rifle seems to shoot better with a full case.
I also find the groups tighten up fairly predictably at about a .5-.6gr interval.
The 2156 is a nice bullet, particularly for the price, considering it is pointed etc etc.
This will shoot about .3moa, but that was measured at 200.
Set 16 Thou off
47.3 of N140. Lapua Palma brass and CCI BR4 primers.
I was using 47.8gr but in reality there was little gained.
Oddly enough, I have found that my rifle seems to shoot better with a full case.
I also find the groups tighten up fairly predictably at about a .5-.6gr interval.
The 2156 is a nice bullet, particularly for the price, considering it is pointed etc etc.
This will shoot about .3moa, but that was measured at 200.
Re: 308 155 gr SMK load
Maggot wrote:47.3 of N140. Lapua Palma brass and CCI BR4 primers.

That's a fairly, um, stiff load you've got there (although if you're using the small flash-hole brass that might explain it.) Ever get any pressure signs?
Gaz
Re: 308 155 gr SMK load
CCI BR4 primers are small rifle so this would be with Palma brass.
One of the characteristics of the small primer (Palma) brass is a reduction in pressure and MV with like for like powder charges versus the normal Lapua .308 Win brass, this would equate to around .5 grains ish so a 47.3 load in Palma is going to give similar results to 46.8 grains in normal brass.
Also the Palma brass does cope with pressures slightly better however at around the GBP25/100 more it is quite an investment.
One of the characteristics of the small primer (Palma) brass is a reduction in pressure and MV with like for like powder charges versus the normal Lapua .308 Win brass, this would equate to around .5 grains ish so a 47.3 load in Palma is going to give similar results to 46.8 grains in normal brass.
Also the Palma brass does cope with pressures slightly better however at around the GBP25/100 more it is quite an investment.
Re: 308 155 gr SMK load
Shouldn't that be "47.3 load in Palma is going to give similar results to 46.8 grains in normal brass"?ovenpaa wrote:One of the characteristics of the small primer (Palma) brass is a reduction in pressure and MV with like for like powder charges versus the normal Lapua .308 Win brass, this would equate to around .5 grains ish so a 47.3 load in Palma is going to give similar results to 47.8 grains in normal brass.
Surely if a like-for-like charge in Palma brass results in lower pressure/MV, then a larger charge is required in Palma brass to achieve the same performance?
..
Re: 308 155 gr SMK load
Rox, My typo, corrected now.
Palma gives lower MV's and pressures for like loads with Win .308 so yes a larger charge is required to give the same performance. The .5 grains is an approximation so it is very important to not assume you can just shove another half grain in the case if it is Palma...
Palma gives lower MV's and pressures for like loads with Win .308 so yes a larger charge is required to give the same performance. The .5 grains is an approximation so it is very important to not assume you can just shove another half grain in the case if it is Palma...
Re: 308 155 gr SMK load
No, even at the higher loads, but yes, it is palma brassGazMorris wrote:Maggot wrote:47.3 of N140. Lapua Palma brass and CCI BR4 primers.![]()
That's a fairly, um, stiff load you've got there (although if you're using the small flash-hole brass that might explain it.) Ever get any pressure signs?
Gaz
Its conservative compared with some.
No, no blown primers in hot weather either, it works. But I don't chamber until ready to go and the ammo is kept covered.
I had one extruded primer early in load testing (quite low down the scale) and still have it as it was a CCI and I suspect the material was over annealed, it only ever happened the once.
The Palma brass is used a lot by the F/TR guys as it will do the job
It does seem that I have quite a quick (30" 3 groove Lilja Palma) barrel hence the velocities.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests