John MH wrote:My No.4T was a disappointment to shoot, as a collectors piece they are great but they don't shoot particularly well these days
By a wide margin the SMLE shoots better than all of them.
Thats a really nice and well balanced Enfield collection John, I don't understand why these No4T's aren't deadly accurate.....I remember reading BATTLE ACTION comic when I was a kid back in the 70's, I remember a story about a No4T sniper hitting a light switch at 400 yds with one.....
oh hang on that was fantasy!!
You really do have to realistic with your expectations regarding the T, my father was a REME Armourer back in the early 50's and his recollection of the T is for obvious reasons a little foggy now, he does remember them being a right pain, freshly FTR'd examples coming back to base workshop and being no great shakes, in fact they weren't as consistently accurate as the then new No4 mk2 on average.
He does remember good examples, (ie a target not looking like it had been hit by a shotgun at 400 yds) being set aside to store and freshly FTR'd examples going straight into base workshop to be stripped back down and re bedded, some being re-bedded, back to the range....and apart again.....more than once before being reduced to DP status!!
Now lets remember they were very well used by then........and that was 60 years ago, the T's went on to serve right into the late 60s early 70s until being replaced by the L42 (rebuilt No4 T) since then they have been used and abused by civilians and constantly mucked about with.
As Adam said, trying to find an original rifle (genuine "T" that still has its original receiver/ bolt , scope and mount) that it was set up with back in WW2 is getting very difficult now.
So treat them like the the lovely collectable old war horses they are, but don't expect tack driving accuracy, I still prefer a good SMLE any day!