Straight Pull L1A1 Proof house Issues

Pre 1945 action rifles. Muzzle loading.

Moderator: dromia

Message
Author
HALODIN

Re: Straight Pull L1A1 Proof house Issues

#51 Post by HALODIN »

As it's in the public domain, if anyone has a copy can you let me know please? I'd like to buy a FAL, but I just need to do my homework first.

Cheers,

Craig.
huntervixen

Re: Straight Pull L1A1 Proof house Issues

#52 Post by huntervixen »

Hi Craig,

Give Anglo or Suffolk a call if its really bothers you, but feel rest assured that if there was any issues the rug would have been pulled out long ago!
HALODIN

Re: Straight Pull L1A1 Proof house Issues

#53 Post by HALODIN »

Thanks for the advice, will do!

Cheers,

Craig.
dirtbag
Posts: 933
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Straight Pull L1A1 Proof house Issues

#54 Post by dirtbag »

kennyc wrote:
Gaz wrote:
SevenSixTwo wrote:Nobody has yet explained to me how an L1A1 conversion is legally possible. Genuinely interested in what the difference is.
I am told it works like this:

A complete firearm can be either section 1 or section 5.
Pressure-bearing component parts of firearms are controlled under Section 1 only.
Therefore, if you take a section 5 firearm and dismantle it, you then have:
a) Destroyed (legally) that section 5 firearm - it no longer exists as a single licensable unit.
b) Created a pile of section 1 components.
If you then assemble a firearm from those parts, which is built so as not to fall into section 5, you then have a section 1 firearm and some leftover bits.

Apparently the Home Office gets a bit anal about closing off gas ports and details of trigger sear operation, but that's the basics. Rather nifty lateral thinking there!
if I remember the conversation correctly, Gavin also had the receivers made so that they were not compatible with the original parts, I have fired one of his and it worked very well, so it was a successful project.
+1, I have one of Gavins L1's
HALODIN

Re: Straight Pull L1A1 Proof house Issues

#55 Post by HALODIN »

Just out of interest and in the context of hard extractions, what are the L1A1's chambered in? 7.62x51 or .308?
PaulR

Re: Straight Pull L1A1 Proof house Issues

#56 Post by PaulR »

HALODIN wrote:Just out of interest and in the context of hard extractions, what are the L1A1's chambered in? 7.62x51 or .308?
Mine is from ACR and it's chambered for .308.

I believe this was done because .308s are normally an easier extraction than 7.62 in straight pulls.
HALODIN

Re: Straight Pull L1A1 Proof house Issues

#57 Post by HALODIN »

Interesting... I was told by the previous owner of my FAL that GGG was buttery, that couldn't have been further from the truth, it was unusable. Rifle pointing straight up with both hands around the cocking handle, banging it on the bench... sign01

I don't think he realised it was chambered in .308, but after trying both on Sunday, .308 was a dream. The main reason I asked, is because I wonder if other people with L1A1's/FALs and are having trouble with extraction, realise what calibre their rifle was chambered in. Mine says 7.62 on the tin, but it's definitely .308 as I spoke with the gunsmith that worked on my rifle.
PaulR

Re: Straight Pull L1A1 Proof house Issues

#58 Post by PaulR »

HALODIN wrote:Interesting... I was told by the previous owner of my FAL that GGG was buttery, that couldn't have been further from the truth, it was unusable. Rifle pointing straight up with both hands around the cocking handle, banging it on the bench... sign01

I don't think he realised it was chambered in .308, but after trying both on Sunday, .308 was a dream. The main reason I asked, is because I wonder if other people with L1A1's/FALs and are having trouble with extraction, realise what calibre their rifle was chambered in. Mine says 7.62 on the tin, but it's definitely .308 as I spoke with the gunsmith that worked on my rifle.
Because I was told that it would be fine, initially, I tried various brands of 7.62 of NATO stuff but all had hard extraction. I found that Privi .308 had less issues but the accuracy was iffy. I then experimented with various brands of .308 but still had extraction problems with most but less with Privy.

As I was always going to hand load for .308 (try getting 7.62 dies - not I wanted any) I now shoot nothing but my own stuff and normally have no issues.

There has always been a question about the compatibility of the the two cartridges and their subtle differences, here's a site that is quite interesting:

http://www.thegunzone.com/30cal.html

Remember though, when considering all these questions and comparisons, they are normally assuming semi-automatic useage. Extraction issues are often not a problem there because of the mechanics and forces involved.

We don't have that luxury so we must try and apply them to straight pulls.


The pressure differences are another thing.
HALODIN

Re: Straight Pull L1A1 Proof house Issues

#59 Post by HALODIN »

Interesting article, thanks. I didn't realise the differences, but after last weekend I'm starting to and I think you're link filled the gaps. Interestingly my M14 cycles GGG 7.62x51 perfectly, almost effortlessly... I'm glad I have something that shoots the 400 GGG rounds I just bought... :grin:
User avatar
bnz41
Posts: 1990
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:20 pm
Home club or Range: NRA Bisley
Location: Essex
Contact:

Re: Straight Pull L1A1 Proof house Issues

#60 Post by bnz41 »

Anglo Custom Rifles[/url] to the best of my knowledge Gavin sold the last of the batch last year, however I haven't seen him in 6 months so maybe he's decided to build another batch?[/quote]

I have heard that Gavin is planning on doing another run of L1A1's when he gets enough names of people who want them.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests