A question about rifling ..

Anything shooting related including law and procedure questions.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Post Reply
Message
Author
zzr1100

A question about rifling ..

#1 Post by zzr1100 »

I was watching a documentary about artillery the other day .. A cannon called the driggs was mentioned (1897 breech loading 1lb shell) apparently the twist rate of the rifling increases towards the muzzle end .. Has this ever been tried in a rifle ? If so why didn't it work ? (I'm assuming it didn't work anyways !)
User avatar
Sim G
Posts: 10752
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: A question about rifling ..

#2 Post by Sim G »

Called progressive or gain twist rifling. I remember some malarky a few years ago when it was mated with monolith bullets in order to build the better mouse trap....
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
saddler

Re: A question about rifling ..

#3 Post by saddler »

...or gain twist rifling

Supposed to be a way to get around the high chamber pressures that happen when a bullet hits the lands/grooves of the rifled barrel & has to be made to spin
GazMorris

Re: A question about rifling ..

#4 Post by GazMorris »

zzr1100 wrote:I was watching a documentary about artillery the other day .. A cannon called the driggs was mentioned (1897 breech loading 1lb shell) apparently the twist rate of the rifling increases towards the muzzle end .. Has this ever been tried in a rifle ? If so why didn't it work ? (I'm assuming it didn't work anyways !)
One of the problems with gain twist / progressive rifling is that it chews up the bullet jackets because of the change in angle of the rifling with respect to the bullet.

Gaz
User avatar
ovenpaa
Posts: 24689
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:27 pm
Location: Årbjerg, Morsø DK
Contact:

Re: A question about rifling ..

#5 Post by ovenpaa »

From memory Bartlein were pushing these type of barrels 2-3 years ago however I never hear of them these days. On the subject of large artillery pieces I remember reading about a large German gun that had the driving bands built in progressive larger sizes to allow for the barrel wear. The interesting part is there was something like 116 shots and then the barrel was scrapped off.
/d

Du lytter aldrig til de ord jeg siger. Du ser mig kun for det tøj jeg har paa ...

Shed Journal
dave_303
Posts: 1260
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 5:49 pm
Contact:

Re: A question about rifling ..

#6 Post by dave_303 »

If I recall don't some models of Carcano have it aswell?
R.G.C

Re: A question about rifling ..

#7 Post by R.G.C »

ovenpaa wrote:From memory Bartlein were pushing these type of barrels 2-3 years ago however I never hear of them these days. On the subject of large artillery pieces I remember reading about a large German gun that had the driving bands built in progressive larger sizes to allow for the barrel wear. The interesting part is there was something like 116 shots and then the barrel was scrapped off.
David,
It was the 'Parizer Kanone" who bombed Paris in 1918 from some 60-70kms away. After that amount, the tube had to be returned to Krupp to be rebored.

At the end of WW2, the germans testes a gun who, not only had a progressive twist, but also a taper bore. From memory, it started at 27mm and ended at some 20mm...

With modern cut rifling CNC driven machines, progressive twist are just a programming affair.

As Gaz mentions, bullet jacket deformation is certainly to consider in terms of accuracy.

Despite Dallas, The Carcano was not a model of accuracy.
R.G.C
User avatar
Sandgroper
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 4735
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: Stanley, Falkland Islands
Contact:

Re: A question about rifling ..

#8 Post by Sandgroper »

I suppose it depends on how you define accuracy? I'm happy with the accuracy of my Carcano M91/28TS and IMO it's no worse/better than any other battle rifle of period. On the other hand the quality of Italian ammunition during WW2 left a lot to be desired.

The Carcano served the Italians well in two world wars and was only retired by the Polizia di Stato (State Police) in 1981! I understand that one of the reasons for the Italians choosing gain twist was that it prolonged the barrel life. I assume they saw this as an advantage over the higher production costs.
My Carcano has gain twist rifling which I believe starts at 1in18 and finishes at 1in8.
“The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.”

Lieutenant General David Morrison

I plink, therefore I shoot.
R.G.C

Re: A question about rifling ..

#9 Post by R.G.C »

Sandgroper wrote:I suppose it depends on how you define accuracy? I'm happy with the accuracy of my Carcano M91/28TS and IMO it's no worse/better than any other battle rifle of period. On the other hand the quality of Italian ammunition during WW2 left a lot to be desired.

The Carcano served the Italians well in two world wars and was only retired by the Polizia di Stato (State Police) in 1981! I understand that one of the reasons for the Italians choosing gain twist was that it prolonged the barrel life. I assume they saw this as an advantage over the higher production costs.
My Carcano has gain twist rifling which I believe starts at 1in18 and finishes at 1in8.
Senggroper,
I would not argue on the Carcano qualities, my only experience being with a captured one in Lybia who found its way to central Africa with a bunch of ammunition....Very poor shooting Ammo or rifle, Ido not know

Regarding the use of old rifles by police forces, the french Garde Mobiles' kept the Mousqueton 16 for riot control very long as well, although there was no longer ammo for it, but its shortness was very handy for the task.

R.G.C
User avatar
Sandgroper
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 4735
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: Stanley, Falkland Islands
Contact:

Re: A question about rifling ..

#10 Post by Sandgroper »

R.G.C.
Mousqueton 16 - I had to look that up! I'm glad I did, it's a very nice looking carbine. :good:
“The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.”

Lieutenant General David Morrison

I plink, therefore I shoot.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests