Chronograph Accuracy

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Post Reply
Message
Author
zeroveez

Chronograph Accuracy

#1 Post by zeroveez »

Can anybody give me any information concerning the path length between the sensors on a CED chronograph and measurement accuracy? The CED has the facility to measure muzzle velocity with the sensors either 2, 4, 6, or 8 feet apart. Intuitively one suspects that the greater the path length involved in the measurement, the better the accuracy. Is there any data?
rox
Posts: 1900
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Chronograph Accuracy

#2 Post by rox »

zeroveez wrote:Intuitively one suspects that the greater the path length involved in the measurement, the better the accuracy. Is there any data?
That is certainly the case for the Oehler 35P, which quotes the following errors for different separations at 3000 fps:

1' : 16 fps
2' : 8 fps
4' : 4 fps
8' : 2 fps

..
zeroveez

Re: Chronograph Accuracy

#3 Post by zeroveez »

Very interesting; I can understand the theoretical advantage of the increase in spacing of the sensors. However, in a telephone conversation with the US manufacturer today, he tells me that this feature is no longer available with their CED chronograph. Furthermore their website shows details of two sets of sensors placed together on the same beam, one set two feet apart and the other six feet apart, the data showing very little difference between the two measurements. I have built an eight foot beam to accomodate my sensors, so I will endeavour to persevere.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests