Page 1 of 1

Enfield .303 correct magazine loading method

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2024 3:23 pm
by Mauserbill
Hello
For all members who do not already know that there is a particular method of loading Enfield 303 rimmed cases into magazines, you may find the attached useful.
I apologise to older members who already know this.

Re: Enfield .303 correct magazine loading method

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2024 8:20 pm
by 20series
3 up, 2 down :good: bangbang

Alsn

Re: Enfield .303 correct magazine loading method

Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2024 9:13 pm
by Pinguino
2 up, 3 down - easy to remember - just like the old house designation ... 3 up, 2 down was a 1980's tv sitcom.

Re: Enfield .303 correct magazine loading method

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2024 11:10 am
by Mattnall
20series wrote: Sat Feb 17, 2024 8:20 pm 3 up, 2 down :good: bangbang

Alsn
2 Up, 3 Down, according to the article.

That's how I've always done it.

Re: Enfield .303 correct magazine loading method

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2024 1:31 pm
by billgatese30
It depends on your perspective and what you consider to be "up", or "down". To be fair I've always just handloaded either single round, or 5 at a time.

Re: Enfield .303 correct magazine loading method

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2024 2:23 pm
by Rearlugs
It doesn't actually matter what sequence the rounds are in the charger - the magazine itself sorts out the cartridges so that bottom rims are to the rear.

I think the "two up three down" was mainly intended to provide a nice symmetric charger for insertion into bandoleers and pouches.

Back in the day, a lot of competition shooters would load the chargers as "rim over rim over rim over over rim"; all five rounds slanted one way in the charger. This was supposed to aid speed loading and avoid jams although, as mentioned, the magazine will auto-sort the rounds anyway, so long as they are stripped off the charger in a brisk soldierly manner.

Re: Enfield .303 correct magazine loading method

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2024 5:06 pm
by Mauserbill
Hello
Reminds me of the song "The grand old duke of York"

And when they were up they were up.
And when they were down they were down.
And when they were only half way up,
They were neither up nor down.