Incorrect info on .gov website

All things shotgun related.

Moderator: dromia

Message
Author
User avatar
bradaz11
Sporadic Site Supporter
Posts: 4724
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:23 am
Home club or Range: The tunnel at Charmouth, BWSS
Location: Bristol
Contact:

Re: Incorrect info on .gov website

#31 Post by bradaz11 »

1066 wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 9:47 pm
Pete wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2023 6:32 pm A lead styphnate primer releases quite a bit of energy when it goes off......who knows what could happen if the anvil broke up?
I'd say there's every possibility of a tiny fragment going through the hole.

Pete
But not regulations on blank rounds that also have a primer and a charge?
not that i think it is a valid idea, but just because... fwd venting blank firers are banned, so the s*** can't go fwd, only up
When guns are outlawed, only Outlaws will have guns
User avatar
Blackstuff
Site Supporter Since 2015
Posts: 7719
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Incorrect info on .gov website

#32 Post by Blackstuff »

Not that I think the primer-projectile theory is correct (more of a plain old fire risk IMO), but blank rounds are either crimped or have captive plastic caps which prevents the vast majority of the debris from coming out with much force
DVC
User avatar
Pete
Past Supporter
Posts: 2951
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 8:48 am
Home club or Range: NRA Bisley
Contact:

Re: Incorrect info on .gov website

#33 Post by Pete »

I've never seen or handled a blank firer, so couldn't comment......and we all know what a pigs' breakfast some of the regulations can be.

Pete
"Tantum religio potuit suadere malorum" Lucretius
You're offended? Please explain why your inability to control your emotions translates into me having to censor my opinions....
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests