Page 1 of 3

Chris Packham is at it again

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2022 10:27 am
by Christel
https://www.c4pmc.co.uk/post/scottish-c ... n-bird-flu

I am not sure what his agenda is....glad that the Scottish Chief Veterinary Officer is calling him out for the liar that he is.

He is also incompetent...

https://www.c4pmc.co.uk/post/simply-awf ... alks-about

Time and time again he is telling his fans lies and distorted non science "facts"....no matter what you believe...check the facts.

Re: Chris Packham is at it again

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2022 11:35 am
by mag41uk
Appalling man. Why the BBC persist in using him beggars belief.
Him and the other two dopes that run Wild justice who have yet to win any case against field sport types and moorland managers etc.
All paid for by donations from the gullible.

Re: Chris Packham is at it again

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2022 12:04 pm
by stottycake
Vile individual crapham is,

Re: Chris Packham is at it again

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2022 12:20 pm
by Christel
I agree with the above, however can anyone tell me what his agenda is?

Re: Chris Packham is at it again

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2022 9:18 pm
by Graham M
Yes, he wants to ban all shooting

Re: Chris Packham is at it again

Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2022 9:50 pm
by Pete
I don't think he wants to ban all shooting, just live quarry for "sport".

I don't have a problem with that...

Pete

Re: Chris Packham is at it again

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2022 7:04 am
by Blackstuff
Theres a shock(!) lol

But he's come out against shooting from crop/animal protection before as well, not just game shooting.

Re: Chris Packham is at it again

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2022 10:49 am
by Christel
So ban shooting. I guess for some people gun ownership regardless of purpose is a difficult subject.

We can all have an opinion however what gets me is the method he uses.

Re: Chris Packham is at it again

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2022 2:31 pm
by Graham M
Pete wrote: Sun Jun 19, 2022 9:50 pm I don't think he wants to ban all shooting, just live quarry for "sport".

I don't have a problem with that...

Pete
Oh dear................ another "Lets ban it as long as it doesn't affect me".

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak for me.

Martin Niemöller
“First They Came, as used today, derives its power from the notion that no one should be instinctively not cared about; that everyone is deserving of attention and, indeed, protection. That is the nature of politics, and of compassion. And it is to our peril, the poem suggests, that we forget how wound and woven we all are, in the end."

Re: Chris Packham is at it again

Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2022 3:18 pm
by Graham M
Sorry Pete, but this is an argument I have seen for over 50 years. When I shot for a prestigious target shooting club in Birmingham all I ever heard was how other sports were not as elite as prone rifle.
When fullbore semi auto' rifles were banned in 88 the consensus was "Good riddance, who needs a fullbore semi auto'?"
And when pistols were banned in 96 the consensus was "Good riddance, all pistol shooters are bloody cowboys."
The thought of deer stalking was absolutely horrendous. The thought of shooting foxes or rabbits for vermin control was unthinkable to them.
The people who shot clays were "hooray Henrys'.
Anyone who shot practical shogun were SAS wannabes.
And as for game shooting............should be banned.

So first they ban game shooting............who cares????
And then they ban deer stalking...........who cares????
So then they ban vermin control............who cares???
And then Pigeon shooting for crop protection...........who cares????
And then practical shotgun................who cares????
And then clay shooting..............who cares????

Until all that's left is target shooting................who's left to care????????????