Re: Mass shooting victims can sue gun manufacturer!
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2019 10:26 am
At the end of the day I think the first person to blame is the mother. She "legally" owned the firearm but allowed it to fall into the hands of her son (who didn't legally own it). I know American laws are different and they don't have to lock guns up the way we do but common sense would say its a good idea when you have kids in the house!
The problem there is the lawyers will tell the families that there is no point in trying to sue her because she doesn't have any money! So they went for the next rich person/company they could find...
As others have said what about car makers? There were a number of vans and lorries used to run over pedestrians in attacks in Europe over the last couple of years. Vans and lorries are much more deadly than a car in the same way that a semi auto "assault" rifle is more deadly than a single shot wooden rifle!
Surely when it gets to court they must realise this and throw it out???
The problem there is the lawyers will tell the families that there is no point in trying to sue her because she doesn't have any money! So they went for the next rich person/company they could find...
As others have said what about car makers? There were a number of vans and lorries used to run over pedestrians in attacks in Europe over the last couple of years. Vans and lorries are much more deadly than a car in the same way that a semi auto "assault" rifle is more deadly than a single shot wooden rifle!
Surely when it gets to court they must realise this and throw it out???