Page 1 of 2
THE REIGATE ARMS CO
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 2:23 pm
by alan108
As I've yet to have a 'positive' experience there,I'll refrain from commenting further.
Alan :(
Re: THE REIGATE ARMS CO
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:16 pm
by Dave 101
What about a negative experiance then is that worth commenting on , you may stop someone else making a mistake in the future .
Dave
Re: THE REIGATE ARMS CO
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:34 pm
by dazeroo
Dear Dave 101,
I'm sure one of the mods will be along shortly, but please acquaint yourself with the "Scotgun" rule above.
Meant to stop people posting remarks that could be held as contentious, esp. in a public forum.
Daz.
Re: THE REIGATE ARMS CO
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:06 pm
by Robin128
See forum rules above please.
:)
Re: THE REIGATE ARMS CO
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:19 pm
by Mike357
Ooooooo,busted :shock:
Re: THE REIGATE ARMS CO
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 9:24 am
by alan108
As of todays date, still no positive result on this matter,which started 24th June 2001.
Re: THE REIGATE ARMS CO
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:14 am
by Robin128
Sporting Gun magazine September 2011 edition has an interesting report.
:|
Re: THE REIGATE ARMS CO
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:37 am
by Doz
Robin128 wrote:Sporting Gun magazine September 2011 edition has an interesting report.
Being miles from a decent newsagent (and not a subscriber!), is that report online anywhere? I'd be interested to read it...
Re: THE REIGATE ARMS CO
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:39 am
by Sim G
Well, if it's already published, is there any problem with relaying what was said in the article?
Re: THE REIGATE ARMS CO
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:42 am
by ovenpaa
Yup, can someone scan and post it or give us a synopsis, any dispute that has been going for 10 years is way beyond a joke.