Proof house records
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2017 12:17 pm
Here's an odd question!, last year I picked up a cheap .223 rifle for my grandson to use it was advertised as a Savage.
Anyway I got it home and realised it wasn't what it seemed to be, firstly it didn't have the usual savage barrel nut and secondly it has a Remington barrel, odd I thought so did Mr SimG.
After a little digging it turns out that the action is a Stevens 200 long action (I know.223) with this Remington barrel somebody has taken a lot of time to build this then it is just thrown into a cheap Savage synthetic stock maybe it was swapped from a nice stock when it was moved on, I don't know I do have plans in the near future to put it into a choate tactical stock (not the fugly one).
So anyway my question from the proof marks dated 2009 would the proof house divulge who submitted it for proof by its serial number ?.
I would really like to find out more of the why and how for this rifle if possible, it is a lovely rifle bar the stock which shows great promise.
Anyway I got it home and realised it wasn't what it seemed to be, firstly it didn't have the usual savage barrel nut and secondly it has a Remington barrel, odd I thought so did Mr SimG.
After a little digging it turns out that the action is a Stevens 200 long action (I know.223) with this Remington barrel somebody has taken a lot of time to build this then it is just thrown into a cheap Savage synthetic stock maybe it was swapped from a nice stock when it was moved on, I don't know I do have plans in the near future to put it into a choate tactical stock (not the fugly one).
So anyway my question from the proof marks dated 2009 would the proof house divulge who submitted it for proof by its serial number ?.
I would really like to find out more of the why and how for this rifle if possible, it is a lovely rifle bar the stock which shows great promise.