MOA v MIL Scope
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 6:21 pm
I'm looking at getting a 3-9 x 40 scope to throw on my AR15 and have wittled it down to either a Leupold VX 2 duplex or Leupold Mark AR mildot.
The VX2 has 1/4 MOA adjustments whereas the Mark AR has 1/10 mil adjustments so slightly better adjustments on VX2. Mark AR has BDC adjustment but for 55 gr .223 whereas I shoot 77gr .223, however I haven't compared ballistics to see how they compare and whether this would be useful. I wouldn't be that interested in paying extra to get a custom BDC made. Also VX2 Duplex is about £60-£80 cheaper
I've always worked off MOA before so wandering whether to try something new in the mildot scope or stick with MOA and use a duplex.
Regarding the mildot I wouldn't be that interested in calculating how far a target is away from me because I already know that since I shoot on a range.
On the plus point it would be quite useful to use mildots for holdovers and to adjust the windage/elevation based on POI to mildot on the recticle for a quick follow up shot. But I guess to do that you first have to positively identify the POI through the scope. If I revert to a spotting scope I'm essentially working off MOA again. Also if switching range eg. from 200-400 yards if I wanted to adjust my scope before firing a shot I'd have to go back to MOA and convert to MIL anyway.
So......am I missing something and talking bo...cks or does MOA and a duplex seem to be the way to go? Or is it the holdovers and quick follow up shots that make the mildots so useful?
The VX2 has 1/4 MOA adjustments whereas the Mark AR has 1/10 mil adjustments so slightly better adjustments on VX2. Mark AR has BDC adjustment but for 55 gr .223 whereas I shoot 77gr .223, however I haven't compared ballistics to see how they compare and whether this would be useful. I wouldn't be that interested in paying extra to get a custom BDC made. Also VX2 Duplex is about £60-£80 cheaper
I've always worked off MOA before so wandering whether to try something new in the mildot scope or stick with MOA and use a duplex.
Regarding the mildot I wouldn't be that interested in calculating how far a target is away from me because I already know that since I shoot on a range.
On the plus point it would be quite useful to use mildots for holdovers and to adjust the windage/elevation based on POI to mildot on the recticle for a quick follow up shot. But I guess to do that you first have to positively identify the POI through the scope. If I revert to a spotting scope I'm essentially working off MOA again. Also if switching range eg. from 200-400 yards if I wanted to adjust my scope before firing a shot I'd have to go back to MOA and convert to MIL anyway.
So......am I missing something and talking bo...cks or does MOA and a duplex seem to be the way to go? Or is it the holdovers and quick follow up shots that make the mildots so useful?