Page 1 of 3
Magazines coming under scrutiny?
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:49 pm
by SevenSixTwo
My FAC
was in the bag (or so I was told)...
My Firearms Branch are now questioning why I need six (6) magazines for my .308. They feel six is "excessive" and want me to justify (which I have done) such a "high" quantity.
FYI, the mags just happened to be listed on the sales invoice together with the firearms (or "weapons" as
they refered to them) I was buying.
I would assume they
do know that they're not restricted items - and that I could potentially buy a billion of them online. Weird. :roll:
I daren't tell them the rifle is 'black'...

Re: Magazines coming under scrutiny
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:55 pm
by John25
Some suggested headings for your letter
1. Expense of re-supply
2. Four needed for SR/Practical disciplines
3. There is no reason in law for them to object
4. Spares required as they are tempremental pieces of sporting equipment.
Don't let them bully you.
Re: Magazines coming under scrutiny?
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:02 pm
by SevenSixTwo
Oh don't worry, my response was polite but firm. I just thought that I'd flag it up here in case this was becoming more prevalent.
Re: Magazines coming under scrutiny
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:07 pm
by Sim G
John25 wrote:
3. There is no reason in law for them to object
That is all you need to reiterate.
Re: Magazines coming under scrutiny?
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:22 pm
by murphwiz
What???
Why the hell are they asking that, any bugger can buy 1 or 50,000 without question!
Thin end of the wedge??
Re: Magazines coming under scrutiny?
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:28 pm
by Mike357
I'd have told them to bog off!
Re: Magazines coming under scrutiny?
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:53 pm
by ovenpaa
What an odd thing to query, I must have a 15-20 magazines in the house, in fact I can see 3 from where I am sitting. Which region are you in?
Re: Magazines coming under scrutiny?
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 10:03 pm
by M1Charles1M
SevenSixTwo wrote:My FAC
was in the bag (or so I was told)...
My Firearms Branch are now questioning why I need six (6) magazines for my .308. They feel six is "excessive" and want me to justify (which I have done) such a "high" quantity.
FYI, the mags just happened to be listed on the sales invoice together with the firearms (or "weapons" as
they refered to them) I was buying.
I would assume they
do know that they're not restricted items - and that I could potentially buy a billion of them online. Weird. :roll:
I daren't tell them the rifle is 'black'...

BASC will be interested to hear this one, e-mail it to
firearms@basc.org.uk Bill Harriman will be very interested!
Membership is not a pre-requisite as the link is freely available on the BASC website.
Stuff like this cannot go unchallenged!
Re: Magazines coming under scrutiny?
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 10:18 pm
by Chuck
Police taking the law into their own hands again.....wasn't Strathclyde was it???
Re: Magazines coming under scrutiny?
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 10:21 pm
by Sim G
I believe 762 in in NI....