.223 subsonic

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Message
Author
JS569

.223 subsonic

#1 Post by JS569 »

Hi All

I was thinking of putting together some .223 subsonics, to plink with on the land I have permission to shoot over. I want to do this for two reasons: 1. Keep the cost down, less powder so more banging for my buck and 2. To keep noise down, whilst there is plenty of safe space to shoot on the land there are a few properties near-by so I don't want to annoy anyone by putting a load of rounds down range. In conjunction I will use a suppressor but the theory is to reduce the noise foot print.

IS this something anyone has done, or has any opinions/ comments on or any load data?

Looking forward to hearing all you're thoughts

regards
User avatar
Sandgroper
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 4735
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: Stanley, Falkland Islands
Contact:

Re: .223 subsonic

#2 Post by Sandgroper »

I had loads of fun with subsonics - 223 being one of them.

I used them in my 223 Saiga (1 in 7 twist) - the noisiest part was cycling the action.

I was using the load posted on the Hodgdon webite 3.1 grains of titegroup. I was using 55gn V-max bullets, which the rabbits didn't like! ;)
“The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.”

Lieutenant General David Morrison

I plink, therefore I shoot.
JS569

Re: .223 subsonic

#3 Post by JS569 »

Sandgroper wrote:I had loads of fun with subsonics - 223 being one of them.

I used them in my 223 Saiga (1 in 7 twist) - the noisiest part was cycling the action.

I was using the load posted on the Hodgdon webite 3.1 grains of titegroup. I was using 55gn V-max bullets, which the rabbits didn't like! ;)
great, I'll be using them in a 1 in 8 twist, so that sounds good! what was accuracy like? Did you use a suppressor?

regards
User avatar
Sandgroper
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 4735
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: Stanley, Falkland Islands
Contact:

Re: .223 subsonic

#4 Post by Sandgroper »

Moderator, yes and the accuracy was good enough for the bunnies! The drop is the biggest limiting factor regarding accuracy - bullet choice will help.

There's isn't that much more to say other than the loading data works and I was happy with the results - try it and see. :good:
“The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.”

Lieutenant General David Morrison

I plink, therefore I shoot.
JS569

Re: .223 subsonic

#5 Post by JS569 »

Great, can't wait to try it! Just need to get a die set now (and the moderator)
User avatar
Sandgroper
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 4735
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: Stanley, Falkland Islands
Contact:

Re: .223 subsonic

#6 Post by Sandgroper »

Try without the mod first - to get a feel for them and to see what the accuracy is before and after you fit the mod.

I shot 7.62 subsonics using Hodgdon data out to 200m without a moderator and I was able to keep them in a fig 11 target.
“The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.”

Lieutenant General David Morrison

I plink, therefore I shoot.
tackb

Re: .223 subsonic

#7 Post by tackb »

Always shoot without a moderator first and check your holes are round in your target you don't want your bullets yawing and fouling the baffles in your mod .
JS569

Re: .223 subsonic

#8 Post by JS569 »

Great Advice, thanks guys.

I thought subsonic .308 might do better than been kept on a fig 11, what sort of accuracy can you expect? My only experience is with .22rf subs which do fine in my standard factory guns
tackb

Re: .223 subsonic

#9 Post by tackb »

I was grouping under 2" at 100m without too much trouble with my 308 subsonic load
User avatar
phaedra1106
Posts: 3429
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:37 pm
Location: Just outside Sacriston (the nice bit!)
Contact:

Re: .223 subsonic

#10 Post by phaedra1106 »

tackb wrote:I was grouping under 2" at 100m without too much trouble with my 308 subsonic load
What bullets are you using?, I ended up with some 162gr lead round nose from Dodgyrog to try as the Hornady A-Max and Nosler CC 168s weren't stable and I had a few keyhole at 100m. I was using 8gr of Titegroup but found 10gr of Trail Boss better.
There's room for all Gods creatures, next to the mash and gravy :)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests