TV and the "Shooting finger"
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:46 pm
Hi all,
Yes, one of "those posts again".
While watching countless American crap* on TV, I've noticed that anyone who whips out a handgun automatically holds it in a Weaver stance with their trigger finger lying along the frame, away from the trigger, be they trained military or housewife.
I watched the other day the good-guy draw his SiG and take a bead on the bad-guy while shouting something heroic, no doubt. Now, the good-guy's finger was lying along the frame, and was not touching the trigger. Now, I will be the first to label myself as a soft civvie with NO military training, but surely if you actually want to shoot something your finger should be on the trigger, no? Just seems odd to me. Why's your finger off of the trigger? You actually want to shoot this guy/guys. Okay, the time taken to whip your finger from frame to trigger is minute, but it's still a delay, and I would even say, a possible way of knocking the trigger when you don't want to.
I'm all for firearm safety, and I understand the "lying finger". Whenever I hold a firearm off-of the range my finger lies along the frame or stock. But when I shoot, my finger's on the trigger.
The only thing I can think of is either:
1) Safety on-set means that you don't put your finger on the trigger while you're actually pointing a firearm at a fellow actor/actress, or:
2) The firearm advisor of the show wants the watcher to know that the show's got an advisor who know's his stuff; that's why HouseWifeA drops into a Weaver stance and adheres to all firearm safety procedures while her life is being threatened.
Thoughts?
*It's not crap because it's American, btw, but just the type of rating-run, crime drama/triller stuff that's flooded TV at the moment. But, hey, give the People want they want, an all that. Funny how they never give me what I want.
Yes, one of "those posts again".
While watching countless American crap* on TV, I've noticed that anyone who whips out a handgun automatically holds it in a Weaver stance with their trigger finger lying along the frame, away from the trigger, be they trained military or housewife.
I watched the other day the good-guy draw his SiG and take a bead on the bad-guy while shouting something heroic, no doubt. Now, the good-guy's finger was lying along the frame, and was not touching the trigger. Now, I will be the first to label myself as a soft civvie with NO military training, but surely if you actually want to shoot something your finger should be on the trigger, no? Just seems odd to me. Why's your finger off of the trigger? You actually want to shoot this guy/guys. Okay, the time taken to whip your finger from frame to trigger is minute, but it's still a delay, and I would even say, a possible way of knocking the trigger when you don't want to.
I'm all for firearm safety, and I understand the "lying finger". Whenever I hold a firearm off-of the range my finger lies along the frame or stock. But when I shoot, my finger's on the trigger.
The only thing I can think of is either:
1) Safety on-set means that you don't put your finger on the trigger while you're actually pointing a firearm at a fellow actor/actress, or:
2) The firearm advisor of the show wants the watcher to know that the show's got an advisor who know's his stuff; that's why HouseWifeA drops into a Weaver stance and adheres to all firearm safety procedures while her life is being threatened.
Thoughts?
*It's not crap because it's American, btw, but just the type of rating-run, crime drama/triller stuff that's flooded TV at the moment. But, hey, give the People want they want, an all that. Funny how they never give me what I want.