Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:33 pm
I didn't scan it cos of Copyrights! 
ashmcc wrote:Here you go.
The UK's Finest Independent Forum for Shooters and Gun Owners. Est 2010.
All people seeking membership must contact admin after registering to be validated.
https://www.full-bore.co.uk/
Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Page 10 of 11
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:44 pm
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 8:00 pm
Was. Not is. The problems have been resolved.zanes wrote:"Any assertion that the judge upheld Miss B-L's case because the NRA is not operating a secure section 5 armoury is false".
Whilst this may be true, the whole case came about because the NRA is not operating a secure section 5 armoury.
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 8:53 pm
"...no insurer would allow anyone to keep the wreck of the car after the insurer paid the owner..."heh?it is standard procedure-my old suzuki vitara was hit by bmw mini of instructor driver when parked,bumper+rear wing in bits-to expensive to repair,written off-money paid in check after deducting 25£ off,as administrative costs,car still in use,just passed mot...
some kind of wicked thinking,but explains all this noise when cancelling most of Club days this year....more to come...?
some kind of wicked thinking,but explains all this noise when cancelling most of Club days this year....more to come...?
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:23 pm
A fair point- I would edit my post but I'm past the edit time. Doh.techguy wrote:Was. Not is. The problems have been resolved.zanes wrote:"Any assertion that the judge upheld Miss B-L's case because the NRA is not operating a secure section 5 armoury is false".
Whilst this may be true, the whole case came about because the NRA is not operating a secure section 5 armoury.
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 11:20 pm
Without a copy of the court transcripts it's going to be impossible to know what the judge actually decided. Gun Trade News obviously had an axe to grind, and naturally the NRA aren't going to publish anything that paints them in a worse light than GTN's slanted coverage already has.
I think it'd cost around £250 to get the transcripts. Whip-round?
I think it'd cost around £250 to get the transcripts. Whip-round?
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 11:36 pm
I would put in a tenner.
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 3:04 am
It's worth a tenner from me 
Mezzer
Mezzer
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 11:02 pm
Hmmm, we thinks you come not to praise Caesar but to bury him...
Be honest, oomans, hasn't the NRA improved just a teeny weeny bit under Mercer's governance? We, being Shire folk, used to be very NRA, but we have to admit that on our recent visits to Bisley the facilities there have improved, the staff are more helpful and the general approach of the NRA seems to be changing for the better.
Be honest, oomans, hasn't the NRA improved just a teeny weeny bit under Mercer's governance? We, being Shire folk, used to be very NRA, but we have to admit that on our recent visits to Bisley the facilities there have improved, the staff are more helpful and the general approach of the NRA seems to be changing for the better.
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 7:40 am
Are you getting the NRA and Bisley confused badger? ;-)