Page 9 of 11
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 9:59 am
by Gaz
Well what does it say?!
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 11:33 am
by Dougan
Have you not received your copy of the Journal yet?
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 12:58 pm
by ovenpaa
Nothing here yet
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 1:04 pm
by Andy632
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 2:06 pm
by kennyc
Seems perfectly sensible explanation to me
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 4:05 pm
by M99
Yes and reassuringly frank and honest it would seem.
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 4:23 pm
by HALODIN
Can someone scan it in please?
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 4:33 pm
by Dannywayoflife
Yes please scan it and post on here please :)
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:23 pm
by ashmcc
Re: Theft from the NRA Armoury.
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:33 pm
by zanes
"Any assertion that the judge upheld Miss B-L's case because the NRA is not operating a secure section 5 armoury is false".
Whilst this may be true, the whole case came about because the NRA is not operating a secure section 5 armoury.