Page 9 of 35
Re: New Petition - Part 2 (Number of signatures: 13,188)
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 8:01 am
by zanes
NRA UK also felt unable to support
If that's true (and I wouldn't be surprised as it's not target rifle (in .308) shot at Bisley), then:
Obviously changed a great deal since 88.....
Re: New Petition - Part 2 (Number of signatures: 13,188)
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 8:46 am
by Blu
Dromia, I hope you will be able to post any reply that you receive from Mr Mercer. I for one would be interest to read what he has to say.
Blu

Re: New Petition - Part 2 (Number of signatures: 13,188)
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 8:51 am
by dromia
I will certainly post whatever I get or don't get from Mr Mercer.
I hope that other NRA members will also be trying to find out the NRA's policy on this and their reasoning behind it.
Re: New Petition - Part 2 (Number of signatures: 13,188)
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:36 am
by Blackstuff
Alpha1 wrote: So we have 1.5 million dinasour certificate holders and 5 million dinasour shooters. Hmm.
So THATS why they became extinct! :lol:
Re: those figures - While i don't doubt that their are 5 million people 'involved' in shooting in some way, i'm pretty sure the actual number of certificates on record at present is around the 750,000 mark, and a good chunk of those will be people who have both FAC's and SGC's. I'd guess the number is more like 500,000-650,000 actual individuals
Re: New Petition - Part 2 (Number of signatures: 13,188)
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:48 am
by zanes
FYI:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... sb0313.pdf
146,426 FAC, 570,726 SGC. I reckon Blackstuffs half a million individuals would be about right.
Re: New Petition - Part 2 (Number of signatures: 13,188)
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:56 am
by Tomo
dromia wrote:I will certainly post whatever I get or don't get from Mr Mercer.
I hope that other NRA members will also be trying to find out the NRA's policy on this and their reasoning behind it.
Just sent them an email too - this cannot be right......................... surely?
Re: New Petition - Part 2 (Number of signatures: 13,188)
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:58 am
by karen
dromia wrote:I will certainly post whatever I get or don't get from Mr Mercer.
I hope that other NRA members will also be trying to find out the NRA's policy on this and their reasoning behind it.
For once we are in agreement concerning the NRA!
They have publicised and supported petitions before so what's different here?
I cannot see why they cannot just say "yes we support you" even if they do bugger all about it.
love
Karen
Re: New Petition - Part 2 (Number of signatures: 13,188)
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:37 am
by dromia
I have had the following reply from Mr Mercer, the NRA are supporting the Unity campaign.
On 16/04/14 12:22, Andrew Mercer wrote:
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> Not true!
>
>
>
> Will be posted on to our website soon – my staff are just working through the major launch of new Membership database so website updates somewhat in arrears.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Adam [mailto:
adam@pukkabundhooks.com]
> Sent: 16 April 2014 08:49
> To: Andrew Mercer
> Subject: Firearms UK Unity campaign
>
>
>
> Hi Andrew
>
> I was wondering what the NRA's position was on the Firearms UK Unity campaign.
>
> I have been told that the NRA felt unable to support this initiative.
>
> Is this true? and if so why does the NRA think it is not appropriate to support it?
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
>
> Adam
Re: New Petition - Part 2 (Number of signatures: 13,188)
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:47 am
by karen
Sendit wrote:
NRA UK also felt unable to support (All Inquiries to NRA UK).
In view of Dromia's above posting can you let us know why you posted the above statement and if you have any proof can you post it here?
Love
Karen
Re: New Petition - Part 2 (Number of signatures: 13,188)
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:51 am
by dromia
Perhaps the NRA reconsidered their position?