Page 8 of 10
Re: A Max's now categorised as expanding ammunition
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 3:42 pm
by Robin128
Chapuis wrote:Hornady's sales in the U.K. are a mere fraction of sales in the U.S. I very much doubt that we even register with them.
One Cabelas shop probably sells a far larger quantity of Hornady products in a year than the combined sales of all outlets in the U.K.
All markets are a fraction of the US market...it's the biggest market in the world.
They may not bother with the A Max packaging/literature of the stock sent to UK. It may well be USA packaging. In any case, there is a Hornady alternative for target shooting.
http://www.hornady.com/store/22-Cal-.22 ... cannelure/

Re: A Max's now categorised as expanding ammunition
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:55 pm
by Steve
Why was expanding ammunition made section 5?
Re: A Max's now categorised as expanding ammunition
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:18 pm
by Robin128
Hope you are not expecting reasoning or logic???
Knee Jerk, I'm afraid.

Re: A Max's now categorised as expanding ammunition
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:28 pm
by ovenpaa
Steve wrote:Why was expanding ammunition made section 5?
Good question, as I am not a hunter I am not sure where the ruling came from either.
Re: A Max's now categorised as expanding ammunition
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:52 pm
by Steve
Robin128 wrote:Hope you are not expecting reasoning or logic???
Knee Jerk, I'm afraid.

Im not trying to be funny,but i fail to see why it was made S5.I mean did the goverment deem FMJ's
less lethal or expanding more dangerous? Anyway,surely it would be more safe to use expanding/balistic ammunition on ranges due to less chance of richochet?
I do think that many goverment depts think up these crazy ideas purely to justify their salary.
Re: A Max's now categorised as expanding ammunition
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:26 pm
by Robin128
Steve,
I know you are not trying to be funny...

...and I meant what I said...we get firearm law changes on a whim. No sense whatsoever.

Re: A Max's now categorised as expanding ammunition
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:29 am
by Sim G
Steve wrote:Why was expanding ammunition made section 5?
Because Thomas Hamilton loaded it into his pistols on that fateful day.......
However, come the Firearms Act re-write, which will happen, I expect to see it drop back to S.1. ACPO even made the suggestion in their submission to the HAC.....
Re: A Max's now categorised as expanding ammunition
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:40 am
by Robin128
Sim G wrote:Steve wrote:Why was expanding ammunition made section 5?
Because Thomas Hamilton loaded it into his pistols on that fateful day.......
However, come the Firearms Act re-write, which will happen, I expect to see it drop back to S.1. ACPO even made the suggestion in their submission to the HAC.....
Don't hold your breath Sim G!
:)
Re: A Max's now categorised as expanding ammunition
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:34 am
by Sim G
Rob, I reckon we could be in for a couple of pleasant surprises............ to sweeten the overall attack!!!!
Re: A Max's now categorised as expanding ammunition
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 10:02 am
by ovenpaa
So I can order my C8SFW now or maybe wait a couple more weeks Sim?