4Islander wrote:
Not really, all that is needed is for the NRA to hold the IPSC franchise, effectively removing the UKPSA executive who are responsible for expelling people & some very poor financial decisions that have wasted a lot of their members money.
Were the people expelled because they were actively going against the UKPSA's best interests?
4Islander wrote:
No need for the demise of any group, all could continue doing what they do which is to promote safe shooting, as Thorney says it needs someone to take away their ball & bang some heads together, IPSC could do that quite easily, simply give the franchise to the NRA & the problems go away.
So what happens to the UKPSA if they lose IPSC? How do they continue?
4Islander wrote:
The groups seperately have done a lot of good work, we have seen practical shooting grow at Bisley, James Harris has worked his socks off to that end with the NRA, & yet as a thankyou the UKPSA have expelled him, how does that action support UK shooting ?
Was he promoting the UKPSA at Bisley or cutting them out?
4Islander wrote:
Equally trying to prevent F4i matches from happening at Bisley is also unsupportive of shooters & the advancement of UK shooting in general, not to mention down right disgraceful.
That is quite petty, sad to see the NRA retaliating in kind too.
4Islander wrote:
Only one group is led by a spiteful core of individuals who after years of dictating how practical shooting in the UK could be done have reacted badly to those who only wished to expand its reach & make it easier for people to get involved thereby circumventing their control.
To be honest only the F4i have seemed spiteful so far. I've not heard a UKPSA member say a bad word about F4i, but plenty of slagging off from F4i. I'm not invested in either group, I'm happy so long as I can shoot regularly and safely. Any interruption in that shooting is what will wind shooters up most I think.
4Islander wrote:
The UKPSA council are reacting this way because they fear the loss of that monopoly, it has nothing to do with doing what is right for UK shooters, if that was their goal they wouldn't have waited years for a group like F4i to come along & force them into reacting more positively now.
I'm pretty sure I'd be miffed if, after almost 40 years of developing practical shooting, another group came along and wanted to take away my business, would you not? If they're reacting more positively now why not try to work with that?
4Islander wrote:
SUPPORT THE NRA !!!
Difficult when all I see is a focus on Bisley. Are they offering anything to anyone outside of Bisley? Funding for new practical equipment for example? Will all major matches be held at Bisley if they win, could this alienate anyone not close to the M25?
I'd still like to know what F4i do differently. As said, I'm new to it so I don't know what the UKPSA did so terribly.