Page 7 of 10

Re: If you could legally would you carry?

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 10:58 am
by Sandgroper
Chuck,
From your earlier post which referenced the "Skyway Shooter"

http://www.examiner.com/gun-rights-in-s ... arge-filed
It was his bad luck that Fletcher, the son of a former Seattle police officer, was using the bank’s ATM at the time. Fletcher heard the shots, went around the corner of the building to investigate, saw Warren rushing toward him and he drew his own gun. Breazeale was hit four times, but the wounds were not life threatening, the charging documents say.

Fletcher handcuffed Warren, who had, according to police and independent sources, soiled his trousers in the process.
and
In that case, Raven Smith is lucky to have been armed with a .380-caliber semi-auto that he used to shoot 17-year-old Anthony Hauser four times. Hauser, who was wearing a ski mask, allegedly charged at Lesley Tanner after she and Smith got out of his car to dine at the restaurant.

"I just knew I had to act; I had to stop this guy."—Raven Smith, St. Petersburg, FL

According to the published report, Smith told Tanner to “get down” and quickly opened fire. He hit Hauser with every shot, and when the teen dropped to the ground, he begged Smith to stop shooting, claiming that his gun was a fake.

Hauser’s credibility evaporated, however, when it turned out that his gun was the real thing, a .25-caliber semi-auto that was loaded.

Hauser, like Warren, faces charges.

No such bad luck will befall either Fletcher or Smith, who properly used their guns to thwart crime; just the sort of people that gun prohibitionists probably consider “extremists.”

Re: If you could legally would you carry?

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:43 am
by Porcupine
No need for extensive training, just make Condition Butterscotch mandatory for 100% safe carry:


Re: If you could legally would you carry?

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:10 pm
by Chuck
No such bad luck will befall either Fletcher or Smith, who properly used their guns to thwart crime; just the sort of people that gun prohibitionists probably consider “extremists.”
warped thinking by those who do not care about human life eh!
law abiding violated.jpg
http://www.jpfo.org and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nckgyfGbdnU some thought provoking videos here

Re: If you could legally would you carry?

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:18 am
by ChrisF
YES , I would , and it would be a high cap 9mm , probably a SIG P228 or 226 , with 2x 20rd spare mags .

if you ever need a pistol in an emergency , you may be out numbered , and you will find the extra rds afforded by high cap guns , to be VERY important .

Re: If you could legally would you carry?

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:59 am
by ovenpaa
SIG is always going to be a good choice and welcome to the forum ChrisF

Re: If you could legally would you carry?

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:02 pm
by Robin128
Welcome to the forum ChrisF :)

Re: If you could legally would you carry?

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 3:24 pm
by enfielddream
Question from America. Under your current gun laws are there any of your citizens for a certain reason allowed to carry a gun concealed? What about private security guards for some of your famous actors, TV personalities etc. What about those that guard Her Majesty the Queen and your PM? ( I am sure that is the case but.......)
Just a couple points of interest, I believe that in the states of Illinois and Hawaii there are no permits to carry for the average bloke. In my state (Rhode Island) a permit to carry is $40.00 for four years, you have to qualify with the gun before a certified NRA instructor and he signs a form to be sent with your application. You can carry any type of gun but only in the caliber that you qualify with or below. Example: If you qualify with a .38 you can carry a .38, .380, 9mm, .357, .32, .25, .22. It is the size of the bullet not the power. If you qualify with a .45, you can carry a .45, .455 (they let you sneak it in), 44 magnum, .357, .32 etc down the list.

Re: If you could legally would you carry?

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:28 pm
by 20series
On the Basis that only the military and police have access to Pistols (with one or two exceptions) and they deal with security of the Royals and Political types that only they can carry.

I would be surprised of any civilian security companies have armed people.

Alan

Re: If you could legally would you carry?

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:45 pm
by M99
In the UK, no "bodyguards" are authorised to carry. The only ones who can "carry" on the UK streets are Authorised police officers, MI5 & 6 and military personal deployed on specific roles (British forces are not routinely armed away from their bases in the UK)

There was talk a few years back of an armed Customs and Excise Unit - some of their guys trained with us at Gravesend, but as far as I know none were every deployed "Armed"

Mike

Re: If you could legally would you carry?

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:39 pm
by ovenpaa
A few years ago I used to meet up with a chap with an Irish accent, we got chatting one day and he expained the different dialects by area, religion and even by road both sides of the border, he could mimic any and all of them. He carried a licenced 9mm at all times. It would have been late 90's from memory. This was post Dunblane and he was most certainly a civvie at that point. One of those odd types that the law made an exception for.

I can only guess at his background but he was a very level headed and pleasant chap to talk to.