The UK's Finest Independent Forum for Shooters and Gun Owners. Est 2010.

Gun control advocates this month took a page from the global warming activists playbook: the science is settled, so there is no need for debate.

However, instead of actually reviewing the scientific literature on the subject, Professor David Hemenway at Harvard made a survey of cherry-picked authors. Surprisingly, he found the vast majority agreed that we need more gun control.

zanes wrote:

Taha wrote:

zanes wrote:Obvious troll/journalist is obvious.

I'm a doctor.

Maybe you are, maybe you aren't. It is painfully obvious that either you're not seriously looking to become a HO approved club member (how would you ever trust yourself with one of these things), or if you are there's probably good reason that clubs aren't taking you on- I shudder to think what your reaction is when you see something like a 15-22 on the range.

I think maybe the fact that I'm for robust gun regulations (not outright bans) over a completely unregulated situation is because of the things I've seen with gun injuries and deaths.

Ever seen a man with his whole face hanging off (and I really do mean that) after being shot in the side of the head? I have. Not pleasant!

That was with a legally held and registered firearm, I take it?

Do you apply the same logic to all the other injuries you see?