Re: .22 centrefire: recommend a rifle for badger
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 8:49 am
Convergence. Now there's a subject that potentially opens a whole new can o' worms.
If we were, for the sake of example, to decide that we wanted our double rifle to be zeroed for 75 mards, ought we to worry too much about true convergence ? If we assume that the bores are parallel, and separated by a calibre, then it ought to be the case (all other things being equal) that we could obtain a group at 75 mards that is simply three calibres measured edge to edge. Regulating the barrels to shoot to the same point at that distance would give a theoretical single calibre hole which, we grant you, is better than three calibres. However, at ranges other than the regulated range, the group size would increase. Hence for practical purposes, might we not be better accepting that a three calibre group size is passable for our needs in the knowledge that it will be a three calibre hole at any distance?
If we were, for the sake of example, to decide that we wanted our double rifle to be zeroed for 75 mards, ought we to worry too much about true convergence ? If we assume that the bores are parallel, and separated by a calibre, then it ought to be the case (all other things being equal) that we could obtain a group at 75 mards that is simply three calibres measured edge to edge. Regulating the barrels to shoot to the same point at that distance would give a theoretical single calibre hole which, we grant you, is better than three calibres. However, at ranges other than the regulated range, the group size would increase. Hence for practical purposes, might we not be better accepting that a three calibre group size is passable for our needs in the knowledge that it will be a three calibre hole at any distance?