Thanks for the reply Dromia.dromia wrote:Besides the restriction, inconvenience and loss in value it is bad law making and should be opposed as such. The bulk of firearms legislation in this country is bad lawmaking that is not fit for the purpose it was masqueraded for and should be opposed as such.
It is not only firearms owners who suffer from poor legislation it is the whole country and as such should be opposed.
Thinking such a move isn't a bad thing just shows the divisiveness of the legislation and the lack of empathy and solidarity amongst shooters and gun owners.
Any gunner worth his or her salt should oppose any firearms legislation unless it is clearly evidenced that doing so will be managed competently and will achieve substantial benefits in regards to reason as to why it is being proposed.
I think you might have misunderstood what I was asking. I am not thinking it isn't a bad thing... I was asking if sect 58 is done away with, what will that actually mean? Having read another post.... does it mean that all of these old antiques need to be registered by owners?
Cheers.