Re: NRA (lack of )support for non Bisley target shooting
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 9:10 am
I have some sympathy with the pishing in the tent point of view rather than pishing outside.
That is what has kept me a member all these years, however I am at the point now where I am thinking individual membership is an exercise in futility as over the decades I have had promise of delivery but it has never happened, how long should I stay this gullible?
I don't know about turning finances round, it should be making money for goodness sake. Mismanagement at all levels got the NRA into its latest round of financial troubles, which it has a history of, and drastic down sizing seems to me is what balance the books at the expense of the staff resource. This has been of no benefit to shooters by severely limiting what it can do.
The biggest issue that I see for the NRA is its lack of meaningful engagement with its membership about it issues, problems and how it is going to tackle them especially for non Bisley shooters.
Engaging with the membership and actively bringing them along with the organisation could go a long way to establishing the key thing that the NRA lacks amongst shooters, goodwill and credibility.
Mercer making promises like he has done here in this topic and then not following up on them just makes him look like an amateur who is snubbing the membership and adds insult to injury. It is this cavalier attitude to the membership that is really making me loose heart with the NRA's current regime.
Notwithstanding the plausible reasons suggested here for the apparent lack of movement on this important national issue of range access we as a membership and the club in question should be getting these explanations from the horses mouth through NRA communication mechanisms not via an open forum that the NRA regards as insignificant and of no importance.
It has been postulated to me that the collapse of access to fullbore ranges outside Bisley could be seen by some NRA people as being no bad thing for Bisley, whilst I don't subscribe to that view I can see that when the NRA's activities on this front are done in such a covert manner why views like this get traction amongst gun owners.
That is what has kept me a member all these years, however I am at the point now where I am thinking individual membership is an exercise in futility as over the decades I have had promise of delivery but it has never happened, how long should I stay this gullible?
I don't know about turning finances round, it should be making money for goodness sake. Mismanagement at all levels got the NRA into its latest round of financial troubles, which it has a history of, and drastic down sizing seems to me is what balance the books at the expense of the staff resource. This has been of no benefit to shooters by severely limiting what it can do.
The biggest issue that I see for the NRA is its lack of meaningful engagement with its membership about it issues, problems and how it is going to tackle them especially for non Bisley shooters.
Engaging with the membership and actively bringing them along with the organisation could go a long way to establishing the key thing that the NRA lacks amongst shooters, goodwill and credibility.
Mercer making promises like he has done here in this topic and then not following up on them just makes him look like an amateur who is snubbing the membership and adds insult to injury. It is this cavalier attitude to the membership that is really making me loose heart with the NRA's current regime.
Notwithstanding the plausible reasons suggested here for the apparent lack of movement on this important national issue of range access we as a membership and the club in question should be getting these explanations from the horses mouth through NRA communication mechanisms not via an open forum that the NRA regards as insignificant and of no importance.
It has been postulated to me that the collapse of access to fullbore ranges outside Bisley could be seen by some NRA people as being no bad thing for Bisley, whilst I don't subscribe to that view I can see that when the NRA's activities on this front are done in such a covert manner why views like this get traction amongst gun owners.