Re: Krag versus SMLE
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 2:53 pm
Quite reasonable to presume that some instructors/shooters are better than others,but the majority would only have been able to fire two or three more rounds than the required minimum. Also bear in mind that 'rapid fire' was not to fire as many rounds as possible but to shoot at a controlled rate of 10-12 rounds a minute. The British Army has never been into 'blazing' away with uncontrolled fire.tackb wrote:Steve E wrote:And very little if any documentary evidence that it actually happened. If Sgt Snoxall existed (and the SASC can't prove it either way) he would have shot the " record" prone from a fire step in a trench on a target that was close to the modern 600 yd target but shot at 200yds. Hardly an example of a high standard of marksmanship. Pre WW1 the standard that all infantry had to achieve was 24 aimed shots in 1 minute. The targets of the day were very large compared to what we shoot on today, so a lot of it is comparing apples with oranges.meles meles wrote:Sergeant Instructor Snoxall, School of Musketry, Hythe, 1914. Rifle charged with 10 rounds to start with.
so reasonable to presume that some are better than others especially instructors and could achieve more than the regulation 24rpm ?
What I have a problem with is people perpetuating what is probably a myth as regards Sgt Snoxall.
The SASC could not confirm his existence when i contacted them about this matter. What the SASC did do when I contacted them several years ago was to confirm that a Sgt Major J A Wallingford, who was a known shot in the Army (1894-1907), may have shot 37 rounds in one minute at 200yds on a large bullseye target but they could not confirm which year, but it would have been prior to WW1 and not with a SMLE but MLLE (Long Lee to those who do not know).