Building a No.4 Enfield

Pre 1945 action rifles. Muzzle loading.

Moderator: dromia

Message
Author
Gaz

Re: Building a No.4 Enfield

#31 Post by Gaz »

I *almost* have a complete rifle! Pictures and details to follow very shortly once I've uploaded them...
User avatar
ovenpaa
Posts: 24689
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:27 pm
Location: Årbjerg, Morsø DK
Contact:

Re: Building a No.4 Enfield

#32 Post by ovenpaa »

Come on man, get them posted!
/d

Du lytter aldrig til de ord jeg siger. Du ser mig kun for det tøj jeg har paa ...

Shed Journal
M99

Re: Building a No.4 Enfield

#33 Post by M99 »

I was recently surprised at the amount of "parts" for the .303 on eblag - you can get almost anything you need - including brand new wood etc!!

Mike
Gaz

Re: Building a No.4 Enfield

#34 Post by Gaz »

There's a hinged front band for a No.4 on there now priced at £75. Wonder if I should tell the seller I picked one up for a few quid at Bisley?

Forgot my imageshack login, give me a minute or two...
Gaz

Re: Building a No.4 Enfield

#35 Post by Gaz »

Presenting one barrelled No.4 action! The barrel is marked F53 on the chamber, which I take to mean Fazackerly 1953 production.
Image

Looks like Fultons had to shim it to get it indexed correctly. Doesn't overly worry me as long as it shoots straight.
Image

Proof mark under the muzzle. I was a bit miffed they didn't put it on the chamber, but then again, you can just about see previous civilian proof marks above. I'm also a bit worried about the location of the foresight mounting block - it does seem rather far back. When the furniture's assembled to the rifle it's very close to the front of the handguards/foreend.
Image

Bolt head, complete with proof mark. You can see where Fultons managed to damage the nock's form on the barrel as well, I guess while torquing it up.
Image

Proofmark on the bolt body. Oddly enough the proof house didn't mark the receiver itself, which could potentially cause dramas if I ever sell this rifle.
Image

Two more views of the nock's form damage. You can also see where a jig or something's marked the receiver. Good job I'm going to repaint the metalwork.
Image
Image

Top view of the rifle, with foreend fitted.
Image

Looking down the length of the rifle, with the foreend fitted. It is bearing at a few points, which'll be fun for me later on. I did relieve some of the wood in the barrel channel, enough to slide a piece of paper around and underneath the barrel. It was at this point I realised I didn't have anything to mark the underside of the barrel with, for bedding purposes, so that'll have to wait.
Image

Close-up view. The barrel is pretty far over in the channel, as you can see.
Image

View into the magazine housing. You can see just how far across the receiver sits.
Image

And a final view of the assembled rifle. It's not quite finished yet but I fancied putting it all together and showing it off!
Image
User avatar
ovenpaa
Posts: 24689
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:27 pm
Location: Årbjerg, Morsø DK
Contact:

Re: Building a No.4 Enfield

#36 Post by ovenpaa »

Looking good. How far are you going to go with the bedding and how will you do it?
/d

Du lytter aldrig til de ord jeg siger. Du ser mig kun for det tøj jeg har paa ...

Shed Journal
Gaz

Re: Building a No.4 Enfield

#37 Post by Gaz »

I'll try and do it service-style, i.e. bedded as per the original armourer's instructions, rather than with glassfibre or modern bedding paste. That said, it depends how bad the fore-end is. If the offset is too much to correct with traditional methods then I'll probably end up using a modern method.
M41B
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:46 pm
Location: Surrey
Contact:

Re: Building a No.4 Enfield

#38 Post by M41B »

Looks very nice, hope it shoots as good as it looks. Let us know how you get on.

By the way just out of curiosity, what reason did they give about marking the barrel????

All the best.
I enjoy my shooting but usually get a better group with the empty cases !!!!
Gaz

Re: Building a No.4 Enfield

#39 Post by Gaz »

M41B wrote:Looks very nice, hope it shoots as good as it looks. Let us know how you get on.

By the way just out of curiosity, what reason did they give about marking the barrel????

All the best.
I didn't mention it when I realised that the bill was marginally cheaper than I was expecting... I consider it a guilt discount!

I doubt the rifle will shoot to any notable standard. Although the crown's in great condition, about an inch of rifling at the throat's been eroded away. I daresay it'll look a bit better once I've been at it with a bronze brush and some Young's 303.

Away from base this week, but hopefully I'll be able to do some work on it on Saturday before heading to Bisley on Sunday. Sunday will be test firing day!
Gaz

Re: Building a No.4 Enfield

#40 Post by Gaz »

Few things feel as good as firing a rifle you've built yourself. 8-)

Having spent all of Saturday night trying to get the barrel properly bedded (see earlier in the thread for why I was dubious about it) I eventually got it to sit roughly inside the barrel channel and assembled the rifle.

Come Sunday morning I took it to the Bisley zero range. Having bought a pack of 8 foresight blades from Terry Abrams (a thoroughly good egg, by the way) I was quite prepared to swap them in and out of the foresight block. I bought a set of Poundland needle-nose pliers and filed the ends down so they fitted into the reverse-headed retaining screw in the foresight mounting block.

This plan went to ratsh!t when I realised I'd left the blades in my shooting bag, which was in the back of a mate's car over at 600yds on Century!

So I zeroed it roughly for windage and secured it, although I wasn't hugely convinced - the blade was hard over to one side and I have a feeling I'll need to re-bed the rifle to get the barrel sitting centrally.

One thing that worried me was the first two rounds had pierced primers and the third was a light strike. I have photos of the cases on my phone camera, which I'll upload in a bit, but (to my inexperienced eye) they weren't showing signs of excessive pressure. The other 10 rounds after those were OK, although I had one more light strike out on the range. Possibly caused by a sticky/binding mainspring?
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests