Re: radio 2 next topic! £200 FAC cost
Posted: Tue May 13, 2014 9:01 am
No, you now use the same form to apply for either an SGC or FAC (or both for a coterminous application).
All people seeking membership must contact admin after registering to be validated.
https://www.full-bore.co.uk/
Um. Did you miss the bit in bold?zanes wrote:Reading this I wonder if plans are to move S2 to S1?Sandgroper wrote:After this topic was raised I wrote to Norman Baker/Home Office and this was the reply:
Make of it what you may...<snip>
In your e-mail you suggest having a single certificate for firearm and shotguns. As a certificate holder you will be interested to know that a single application form for firearm and shotgun certificates was introduced on 1 December 2013 and is available to download via police and shooting organisation websites.
<snip>
You also suggest in your e-mail that all section 1 firearms be re-categorised to section 2. The UK Government has always made it clear that controls on firearms should be targeted fairly and proportionately whilst striking a balance between securing public safety without bearing down unnecessarily on legitimate users. I can confirm that there are no plans to re-categorise the status of any weapons within the Firearms Act.
Why would you wonder that...?zanes wrote:Reading this I wonder if plans are to move S2 to S1?Sandgroper wrote:After this topic was raised I wrote to Norman Baker/Home Office and this was the reply:
Make of it what you may...<snip>
In your e-mail you suggest having a single certificate for firearm and shotguns. As a certificate holder you will be interested to know that a single application form for firearm and shotgun certificates was introduced on 1 December 2013 and is available to download via police and shooting organisation websites.
<snip>
You also suggest in your e-mail that all section 1 firearms be re-categorised to section 2. The UK Government has always made it clear that controls on firearms should be targeted fairly and proportionately whilst striking a balance between securing public safety without bearing down unnecessarily on legitimate users. I can confirm that there are no plans to re-categorise the status of any weapons within the Firearms Act.
I read it. I didn't trust it*.Gaz wrote: Um. Did you miss the bit in bold?
i must be getting old i actually agree with badgerThin end of a dangerous wedge, oomans. We agree with the running man and the fat rat: we pay for policing through taxation and do not benefit as individual shooters from the licence, hence it should scrapped. If we buy a fishing licence, the waterways are maintained for us. If we buy a TV Licence we are provided with entertainment (reportedly). The police provide nothing of benefit to us for the cost of our licence.
Have either of you said this to the powers that be?greenshoots wrote:i must be getting old i actually agree with badgerThin end of a dangerous wedge, oomans. We agree with the running man and the fat rat: we pay for policing through taxation and do not benefit as individual shooters from the licence, hence it should scrapped. If we buy a fishing licence, the waterways are maintained for us. If we buy a TV Licence we are provided with entertainment (reportedly). The police provide nothing of benefit to us for the cost of our licence.
greenshoots
Wow... now that's nearly 50 years ago... pre 68'. Like it & yes how easy was it to get a shotgun then?Dark Skies wrote:I'd like to go back to the good old days when you just popped into the Post Office and bought a firearms license. Massive time saving for the police and no cost to them. It's just a piece of paper to give the illusion of safety after all. Won't do doodly to protect them from criminals.